Heidegger

it relates to the notorious ‘Venlo’ affair where two british secret agents
were kidnapped bt the SD. The Gestapo was tasked with producing a connection
between the British agents captured and an attempt on hitlers life in the
Burgerbrau beer hall on the 8th of Nov;
Towards the end of the meal Hitler suddenly asked Schellenberg, ‘What was
your […]

—–Oorspronkelijk bericht—–
Van: heidegger-bounces at soca.ecu.edu.au
[mailto:heidegger-bounces@soca.ecu.edu.au]Namens bob scheetz
Verzonden: vrijdag 30 juni 2006 16:01
Aan: Discussions pertaining to the philosophy of Martin Heidegger
Onderwerp: Re: Broken Tools
—– Original Message —–
From: “Bakker, R.B.M. de”
To: “Discussions pertaining to the philosophy of Martin Heidegger”
Sent: Thursday, June 29, 2006 8:00 AM
Subject: RE: Broken Tools
………………………………………..
besides rene , why arent your posts subject to the […]

on 29/6/06 10:43 PM, Bakker, R.B.M. de at R.B.M.deBakker at uva.nl wrote:
>
>
> —–Oorspronkelijk bericht—–
> Van: heidegger-bounces at soca.ecu.edu.au
> [mailto:heidegger-bounces@soca.ecu.edu.au]Namens peter k
> Verzonden: donderdag 29 juni 2006 14:54
> Aan: Discussions pertaining to the philosophy of Martin Heidegger
> Onderwerp: Re: Broken Tools
>
>
> on 29/6/06 8:00 PM, Bakker, R.B.M. de at R.B.M.deBakker at uva.nl wrote:
>
>>
>>
>> —–Oorspronkelijk bericht—–
>> […]

it relates to the notorious ‘Venlo’ affair where two british secret agents
were kidnapped bt the SD. The Gestapo was tasked with producing a connection
between the British agents captured and an attempt on hitlers life in the
Burgerbrau beer hall on the 8th of Nov;
Towards the end of the meal Hitler suddenly asked Schellenberg, ‘What was
your […]

anthony writes:
>Philosophically, there is still a strong parallel with the
>Husserlian take on equipmentality: the philosophical prioritization
>of the bare ISness of religion apart from its particular
>embodiments, with his scientific prioritization of the bare
>presence/thingness of equipment apart from its particular use. So
>the parallel response (mine to you with Heidegger’s to Husserl)
>would be: religion can be […]

—– Original Message —–
From: “Bakker, R.B.M. de”
To: “Discussions pertaining to the philosophy of Martin Heidegger”
Sent: Thursday, June 29, 2006 8:00 AM
Subject: RE: Broken Tools
………………………………………..
besides rene , why arent your posts subject to the same nihlism, text is
nothing if not organnization, the phenomenological ‘pureland’ that you
heideggerrians subscribe as a aprior is bollocks! It could be minutley […]

—–Oorspronkelijk bericht—–
Van: heidegger-bounces at soca.ecu.edu.au
[mailto:heidegger-bounces@soca.ecu.edu.au]Namens peter k
Verzonden: donderdag 29 juni 2006 14:54
Aan: Discussions pertaining to the philosophy of Martin Heidegger
Onderwerp: Re: Broken Tools
on 29/6/06 8:00 PM, Bakker, R.B.M. de at R.B.M.deBakker at uva.nl wrote:
>
>
> —–Oorspronkelijk bericht—–
> Van: heidegger-bounces at soca.ecu.edu.au
> [mailto:heidegger-bounces@soca.ecu.edu.au]Namens peter k
> Verzonden: woensdag 28 juni 2006 20:57
> Aan: Discussions pertaining to the philosophy […]

on 29/6/06 8:00 PM, Bakker, R.B.M. de at R.B.M.deBakker at uva.nl wrote:
>
>
> —–Oorspronkelijk bericht—–
> Van: heidegger-bounces at soca.ecu.edu.au
> [mailto:heidegger-bounces@soca.ecu.edu.au]Namens peter k
> Verzonden: woensdag 28 juni 2006 20:57
> Aan: Discussions pertaining to the philosophy of Martin Heidegger
> Onderwerp: Re: Broken Tools
>
>
> on 27/6/06 9:56 PM, Bakker, R.B.M. de at R.B.M.deBakker at uva.nl wrote:
>
>>
>>
>> —–Oorspronkelijk bericht—–
>> […]

—–Oorspronkelijk bericht—–
Van: heidegger-bounces at soca.ecu.edu.au
[mailto:heidegger-bounces@soca.ecu.edu.au]Namens peter k
Verzonden: woensdag 28 juni 2006 20:57
Aan: Discussions pertaining to the philosophy of Martin Heidegger
Onderwerp: Re: Broken Tools
on 27/6/06 9:56 PM, Bakker, R.B.M. de at R.B.M.deBakker at uva.nl wrote:
>
>
> —–Oorspronkelijk bericht—–
> Van: heidegger-bounces at soca.ecu.edu.au
> [mailto:heidegger-bounces@soca.ecu.edu.au]Namens peter k
> Verzonden: dinsdag 27 juni 2006 15:32
> Aan: Discussions pertaining to the philosophy […]

on 27/6/06 9:56 PM, Bakker, R.B.M. de at R.B.M.deBakker at uva.nl wrote:
>
>
> —–Oorspronkelijk bericht—–
> Van: heidegger-bounces at soca.ecu.edu.au
> [mailto:heidegger-bounces@soca.ecu.edu.au]Namens peter k
> Verzonden: dinsdag 27 juni 2006 15:32
> Aan: Discussions pertaining to the philosophy of Martin Heidegger
> Onderwerp: Re: Broken Tools
>
>
> on 26/6/06 5:23 PM, Bakker, R.B.M. de at R.B.M.deBakker at uva.nl wrote:
>
>>
>>
>> —–Oorspronkelijk bericht—–
>> […]