Heidegger

>> since Kenneth strongly implied that the condemnation of suicide was only a
>> “wacko godder” concept.
>
>Both Plato and Aristotle believed in God, and they could be considered
>Christians avant la lettre. Nietzsche did that by calling Christianity as
>Platonism for the masses.
>
>Greetings,
>
>Tudor
Hello Tudor, perhaps its strange to say but I’m pleased to hear your
written voice here […]

—– Original Message —–
From: “Bakker, R.B.M. de”
Van: heidegger-bounces at soca.ecu.edu.au namens Anthony Crifasi
agreed that it’s grotesquery, but philosophy gave up its claim to “plights”
and such long ago, ever since Hume leveled all ethical significance to mere
*felt* significance; and Kant surpassed him, but at the cost of any reality
to the phenomena; and Heidegger exposes […]

________________________________
Van: heidegger-bounces at soca.ecu.edu.au namens Philip Baker
Verzonden: zo 30-7-2006 23:06
Aan: heidegger at soca.ecu.edu.au
Onderwerp: Re: Aristotle on suicide [was Heidegger Email List?]
In article , Anthony Crifasi
writes
>—– Original Message —–
>From: “Philip Baker”
>
>
>> In article , Anthony Crifasi
>> writes
>>>no need to appeal to wacko godders:
>>>
>>>”the man who voluntarily kills himself … acts unjustly… And it is […]

—– Original Message —–
From: “bob scheetz”
> —– Original Message —–
> From: “Anthony Crifasi”
>>
>> agreed that it’s grotesquery, but philosophy gave up its claim to
> “plights”
>> and such long ago, ever since Hume leveled all ethical significance to
> mere
>> *felt* significance; and Kant surpassed him, but at the cost of any
> reality
>> to the […]

________________________________
Van: heidegger-bounces at soca.ecu.edu.au namens Anthony Crifasi
Verzonden: zo 30-7-2006 20:49
Aan: Discussions pertaining to the philosophy of Martin Heidegger
Onderwerp: Re: Heidegger Email List?
—– Original Message —–
From: “bob scheetz”
> cooly discussing the most obstruse concepts while utterly impervious to
> plight of pitifully weak people getting dismembered and burned alive right
> in front of you, seems […]

—– Original Message —–
From: “Tudor Georgescu”
>> since Kenneth strongly implied that the condemnation of suicide was only
>> a
>> “wacko godder” concept.
>
> Both Plato and Aristotle believed in God, and they could be considered
> Christians avant la lettre. Nietzsche did that by calling Christianity as
> Platonism for the masses.
I think we all know which […]

Is then philosophy an objective and neutral way of thinking that has
no engagement with a feeling such as outrage?
Abdassamad
On 30 Jul 2006, at 21:09, Anthony Crifasi wrote:
> —– Original Message —– From: “michaelP” sign.co.uk>
>
>
>> Anthony, surely it is not just a matter of speaking (or not
>> speaking) big
>> but how to *say* something […]

—– Original Message —–
From: “bob scheetz”
> —– Original Message —–
> From: “Anthony Crifasi”
>>
>> Socrates’ sentence wasn’t self-imposed - the fact that it was by his own
>> hand was accidental, since he explicitly gave his own position on the
>> subject (according to Plato, at least) during the very time he was
>> waiting
>> to die:
>>
>> […]

> since Kenneth strongly implied that the condemnation of suicide was only a
> “wacko godder” concept.
Both Plato and Aristotle believed in God, and they could be considered
Christians avant la lettre. Nietzsche did that by calling Christianity as
Platonism for the masses.
Greetings,
Tudor

> It was self-imposed, …in the same place (Phaedo)
> he’s offered exile and refuses.
Socrates was faced with the choice: “Should I run as a coward or face the
legal sentence for my deeds?” He chose that he should not run as a coward.
It is true that the sentence was punishment by death. Again, by running […]