Heidegger

> — michaelP wrote:
>>
>> Thanks, Philip, in the past I have discussed this Heraclitian fragment,
>> arguing that _polemos_ can not be (in the context of the actual fragment)
>> translated as what we understand as war (especially if one bothers with the
>> full fragment and not just the famous first clause). I visited the […]

— michaelP wrote:
>
> Thanks, Philip, in the past I have discussed this Heraclitian fragment,
> arguing that _polemos_ can not be (in the context of the actual fragment)
> translated as what we understand as war (especially if one bothers with the
> full fragment and not just the famous first clause). I visited the relevant
> […]

I said I didn’t have your book handy, not that I didn’t want to buy it. It’s
not around, so could *you* please cite this supposed “doctrine” that I’ve
never come across?
—– Original Message —–
From:
To:
Cc:
Sent: Wednesday, August 30, 2006 11:28 PM
Subject: Re: WAS HEIDEGGER POSSESSED BY THE DEVIL?
> In a message dated 8/30/2006 11:18:50 PM Eastern […]

> In article , GEVANS613 at aol.com writes
> quoting Faye supposedly quoting Heidegger
>>*identifying the hidden enemies within the nation - “in order to annihilate
>>them totally:”
>
>
> Philippe Arjakovsky points out that Faye is not quoting from an
> unpublished lecture but from one that was published several years ago
> and nothing remarkable was seen in […]

Dr Michael Eldred:
Yes, “*Being* does not *name* anything - for there is nothing to be named.”
Strangely, we agree that being is nothing, you in the form of denial, I in
the form of affirmation. Children, and most other people, do not need to
know anything about dimension to play out their lives. They take it for
granted […]

In article , GEVANS613 at aol.com writes
quoting Faye supposedly quoting Heidegger
>*identifying the hidden enemies within the nation - “in order to annihilate
>them totally:”
Philippe Arjakovsky points out that Faye is not quoting from an
unpublished lecture but from one that was published several years ago
and nothing remarkable was seen in it at the time. It […]

In a message dated 8/30/2006 11:18:50 PM Eastern Daylight Time,
crifasian at sbcglobal.net writes:
—– Original Message —–
From:
> In a message dated 8/30/2006 11:06:41 AM Eastern Daylight Time,
> GEVANS613 at aol.com writes:
>
> In the past Father Amorth has also spoken out against the Harry Potter
> books,
> claiming that reading the novels of the teen wizard […]

In a message dated 8/30/2006 11:09:06 PM Eastern Daylight Time,
GEVANS613 at aol.com writes:
Jud, here is another one (poem):
Leave out Heidegger’s crap-mangled renderings
of Ancient Greek terms.
If there is no equivalent in the language of Shakespeare,
append your OWN meaning of the word in question.
I prefer not to waste time on winkling word-definitions,
jogging around the […]

A poem:
What’s have we here
that has suddenly emerged
from the synapsidian swamp of ingenuous apologia?
Slick-slide back neath the slippery slop from whence you surfaced
The air up here is too rarefied
for subaqueous crocodilian lungs -
your pneumogastric nerve will burst
and airbrush the slopes of *Being*
a daseinic damson-blue.
I can spot an engineering-troll who wants to ratchet
up […]

—– Original Message —–
From:
> In a message dated 8/30/2006 11:06:41 AM Eastern Daylight Time,
> GEVANS613 at aol.com writes:
>
> In the past Father Amorth has also spoken out against the Harry Potter
> books,
> claiming that reading the novels of the teen wizard open children’s minds
> to
> dabbling with the occult and black magic. Father […]