Archive for August, 2006

WAS HEIDEGGER POSSESSED BY THE DEVIL?

Posted in Heidegger Email List on August 31st, 2006, search related
Related posts :: WAS HEIDEGGER POSSESSED BY THE DEVIL? :: WAS HEIDEGGER POSSESSED BY THE DEVIL?) :: WAS HEIDEGGER POSSESSED BY THE DEVIL? :: WAS HEIDEGGER POSSESSED BY THE DEVIL?

In a message dated 8/30/2006 6:49:26 PM Eastern Daylight Time,
tgeorgescu at home.nl writes:
> Asan addendum to my previous: given the grandee materialist must hold that
> the likes of possession, the devil, Nazis, etc do not exist, that (is)
> they have no analytical status other than than of nothingness (no thing-
> ness) which means speech […]

WAS HEIDEGGER POSSESSED BY THE DEVIL?

Posted in Heidegger Email List on August 31st, 2006, search related
Related posts :: WAS HEIDEGGER POSSESSED BY THE DEVIL? :: WAS HEIDEGGER POSSESSED BY THE DEVIL?) :: WAS HEIDEGGER POSSESSED BY THE DEVIL? :: WAS HEIDEGGER POSSESSED BY THE DEVIL?

In a message dated 31/08/2006 03:43:55 GMT Standard Time,
metatron99 at hotmail.com writes:
Jud,
I’ll take you up on your challenge. Let’s discuss Heidegger’s understanding
of truth. I anxiously await your detailed and erudite analysis/refutation.
Kevin Winters
Jud:
As you are the one that [presumably] believes in Heidegger’s potty
brainwashery that THERE IS such a thing as *truth* […]

WAS HEIDEGGER POSSESSED BY THE DEVIL?

Posted in Heidegger Email List on August 31st, 2006, search related
Related posts :: WAS HEIDEGGER POSSESSED BY THE DEVIL? :: WAS HEIDEGGER POSSESSED BY THE DEVIL?) :: WAS HEIDEGGER POSSESSED BY THE DEVIL? :: WAS HEIDEGGER POSSESSED BY THE DEVIL?

Jud,
Ill take you up on your challenge. Lets discuss Heideggers understanding
of truth. I anxiously await your detailed and erudite analysis/refutation.
Kevin Winters
_____
From: heidegger-bounces at soca.ecu.edu.au
[mailto:heidegger-bounces@soca.ecu.edu.au] On Behalf Of GEVANS613 at aol.com
Sent: Wednesday, August 30, 2006 8:56 PM
To: heidegger at soca.ecu.edu.au
Subject: Re: WAS HEIDEGGER POSSESSED BY THE DEVIL?
In a message dated […]

WAS HEIDEGGER POSSESSED BY THE DEVIL?

Posted in Heidegger Email List on August 31st, 2006, search related
Related posts :: WAS HEIDEGGER POSSESSED BY THE DEVIL? :: WAS HEIDEGGER POSSESSED BY THE DEVIL?) :: WAS HEIDEGGER POSSESSED BY THE DEVIL? :: WAS HEIDEGGER POSSESSED BY THE DEVIL?

In a message dated 8/30/2006 11:06:41 AM Eastern Daylight Time,
GEVANS613 at aol.com writes:
According to secret Vatican documents recently released wartime pontiff Pope
Pius XII attempted a “long distance” exorcism of Hitler which failed to have
any effect.
Jud, how do you know that? Or should we admit that it was only a
“coincidence” that Der Feuhrer was doomed […]

*Being* is *Nothing*

Posted in Heidegger Email List on August 31st, 2006, search related
Related posts :: No related posts

In a message dated 31/08/2006 02:49:06 GMT Standard Time, Bernx at aol.com
writes:
In a message dated 8/30/2006 9:35:35 AM Eastern Daylight Time,
GEVANS613 at aol.com writes:
Dr Michael Eldred:
Yes, “*Being* does not *name* anything - for there is nothing to be named.”
Strangely, we agree that being is nothing, you in the form of denial, I in
the […]

*Being* as God? Heiddegger as the Prophet? Opportunity Knocks for Listmem…

Posted in Heidegger Email List on August 31st, 2006, search related
Related posts :: *Being* as God? Heiddegger as the Prophet? Opportunity Knocks for Listmembers? :: Foreign policy :: Sheldrake :: Palestinian Sunday School

In a message dated 8/30/2006 10:18:32 AM Eastern Daylight Time,
GEVANS613 at aol.com writes:
He is trying to establish the Church of Now, a God-optional religion that
lists 14 precepts, including, “The only ‘sin’ is not living fully,” and, “This
life is the one that counts; this IS your eternal reward.”
The religion has elements of Buddhism, Taoism and […]

*Being* is *Nothing*

Posted in Heidegger Email List on August 31st, 2006, search related
Related posts :: No related posts

In a message dated 8/30/2006 9:35:35 AM Eastern Daylight Time,
GEVANS613 at aol.com writes:
Dr Michael Eldred:
Yes, “*Being* does not *name* anything - for there is nothing to be named.”
Strangely, we agree that being is nothing, you in the form of denial, I in the
form of affirmation. Children, and most other people, do not need to […]

WAS HEIDEGGER POSSESSED BY THE DEVIL?

Posted in Heidegger Email List on August 31st, 2006, search related
Related posts :: WAS HEIDEGGER POSSESSED BY THE DEVIL? :: WAS HEIDEGGER POSSESSED BY THE DEVIL?) :: WAS HEIDEGGER POSSESSED BY THE DEVIL? :: WAS HEIDEGGER POSSESSED BY THE DEVIL?

In a message dated 31/08/2006 00:50:13 GMT Standard Time,
_metatron99 at hotmail.com_ (mailto:metatron99@hotmail.com) writes: Jud,
Honestly, what do you provide for this list? You are not here to discuss
Heidegger, you simply throw out vehement invectives against anyone that
disagrees with you (with nary an argument in sight). Why are you here? Why invest so
much time […]

WAS HEIDEGGER POSSESSED BY THE DEVIL?

Posted in Heidegger Email List on August 30th, 2006, search related
Related posts :: WAS HEIDEGGER POSSESSED BY THE DEVIL? :: WAS HEIDEGGER POSSESSED BY THE DEVIL?) :: WAS HEIDEGGER POSSESSED BY THE DEVIL? :: WAS HEIDEGGER POSSESSED BY THE DEVIL?

Jud,
Honestly, what do you provide for this list? You are not here to discuss
Heidegger, you simply throw out vehement invectives against anyone that
disagrees with you (with nary an argument in sight). Why are you here? Why
invest so much time and energy to simply be a troll?
Kevin Winters
_____
From: heidegger-bounces at […]

WAS HEIDEGGER POSSESSED BY THE DEVIL?

Posted in Heidegger Email List on August 30th, 2006, search related
Related posts :: WAS HEIDEGGER POSSESSED BY THE DEVIL? :: WAS HEIDEGGER POSSESSED BY THE DEVIL?) :: WAS HEIDEGGER POSSESSED BY THE DEVIL? :: WAS HEIDEGGER POSSESSED BY THE DEVIL?

In a message dated 30/08/2006 23:49:26 GMT Standard Time, tgeorgescu at home.nl
writes:
> Asan addendum to my previous: given the grandee materialist must hold that
> the likes of possession, the devil, Nazis, etc do not exist, that (is)
> they have no analytical status other than than of nothingness (no thing-
> ness) which […]