Heidegger

THIS IS SECTION ZWEI OF JUD EVANS’ ANSWER TO Plato Theaet. 155e ’something’
PART ONE OF TWO
(THIS TOO HAD TO BE SPLIT IN TWO BECAUSE IT WAS BOUNCED AS BEING TOO LONG.)
DR. ELDRED: [PREVIOUSLY] … there is nothing at all to say about whether
anything exists or not, for to say anything would be […]

In a message dated 28/09/2006 _metatron99 at hotmail.com_
(mailto:metatron99@hotmail.com)
writes: Jud,
I don’t think you responded to this, so I thought I’d resend it.
Kevin Winters
JUD EVANS (NEW)
Hi Kevin,
You were right - your first message had gone astray - it is the first time I
have seen it.
Ah well - better late than never. […]

Cologne 30-Sep-2006
GEVANS613 at aol.com schrieb Fri, 29 Sep 2006 15:16:51 EDT:
> PART ONE OF TWO. In a message dated 29/09/2006 10:48:14 GMT Standard
> Time, artefact at t-online.de writes:
> JUD EVANS:Your contention therefore must be that if language is NOT an
> assemblage of convenient abstractions - it must be an assemblage of
> convenient material […]

Cologne 30-Sep-2006
GEVANS613 at aol.com schrieb Fri, 29 Sep 2006 15:30:13 EDT:
> PART TWO OF TWO. JUD EVANS: - so if you are truly convinced that my
> postulated basic unit called “causal object is no less an abstraction
> than the category of “something to drink* then I invite you to
> participate in a public […]

PART TWO OF TWO.
JUD EVANS:
- so if you are truly convinced that my postulated basic unit called
“causal object is no less an abstraction than the category of “something to drink*
then I invite you to participate in a public demonstration. A modern version
of Dr Johnson’s invitation to Bishop Berkeley to kick a stone. […]

PART ONE OF TWO.
In a message dated 29/09/2006 10:48:14 GMT Standard Time,
_artefact at t-online.de_ (mailto:artefact@t-online.de) writes:
JUD EVANS:
Your contention therefore must be that if language is NOT an assemblage of
convenient abstractions - it must be an assemblage of convenient material
objects?
DR. ELDRED:
No, language is the articulation of human understanding — neither
especially convenient, nor a material […]

In a message dated 9/28/2006 4:37:34 PM Eastern Daylight Time,
GEVANS613 at aol.com writes:
In a message dated 28/09/2006 Bernx at aol.com writes:
JUD [earlier]
Homocentric attribution of guilt does not make ontological sense when we
address insensate objects like a rusty nail.
BERNARD:
Then, Jud, how is it possible to say: “….deterministically causes THE
TRAUMA - [the nail or the cancer] […]

Cologne 29-Sep-2006
GEVANS613 at aol.com schrieb Thu, 28 Sep 2006 14:24:22 EDT:
> In a message dated 28/09/2006 artefact at t-online.de writes: Cologne
> 28-Sep-2006
> JUD EVANS: Please note as usual - the caps are for emphasis only.JUD
> EVANS: [earlier]It depends in what sense and in what circumstances the
> significations are employed. Sometimes the […]

In a message dated 28/09/2006 23:21:31 GMT Standard Time, phil at thalasson.com
writes:
Philip Baker
Perhaps all your posts are a systematic exercise in irony. That would
explain a lot.
Cue the music Maestro!
Philip Doolittle;
The pain in Spain stays mainly in the plain!
Jud:
By George, he’s got it! By George, he’s got it!
Now, once again where does […]

In article , GEVANS613 at aol.com writes
>
>
>In a message dated 28/09/2006 21:12:23 GMT Standard Time, phil at thalasson.com
>writes:
>
>In article _GEVANS613 at aol.com_ (mailto:GEVANS613@aol.com) writes how does
>this modern misunderstanding arise? I suggest here that it is because people
>confuse the apparently obvious phenomenological EXISTENCE of the abstraction
>’pain,’ with ‘that which ACTUALLY EXISTS
>
>There is […]