Heidegger

In a message dated 28/09/2006 21:12:23 GMT Standard Time, phil at thalasson.com
writes:
In article _GEVANS613 at aol.com_ (mailto:GEVANS613@aol.com) writes how does
this modern misunderstanding arise? I suggest here that it is because people
confuse the apparently obvious phenomenological EXISTENCE of the abstraction
‘pain,’ with ‘that which ACTUALLY EXISTS
There is no confusion. People are concerned with […]

In a message dated 28/09/2006 _Bernx at aol.com_ (mailto:Bernx@aol.com) writes:
JUD [earlier]
Homocentric attribution of guilt does not make ontological sense when we
address insensate objects like a rusty nail.
BERNARD:
Then, Jud, how is it possible to say: “….deterministically causes THE
TRAUMA - [the nail or the cancer] and *that which deterministically UNDERGOES the
tissue […]

In article , GEVANS613 at aol.com writes
>how does this modern misunderstanding
>arise? I suggest here that it is because people confuse the apparently obvious
>phenomenological EXISTENCE of the abstraction ‘pain,’ with ‘that which
>ACTUALLY EXISTS
There is no confusion. People are concerned with the everyday reality of
pain - what you call its ‘obvious phenomenological existence’. They […]

In a message dated 9/28/2006 7:41:03 AM Eastern Daylight Time,
GEVANS613 at aol.com writes:
So leaving the plonker Plato aside, how does this modern misunderstanding
arise? I suggest here that it is because people confuse the apparently obvious
phenomenological EXISTENCE of the abstraction ‘pain,’ with ‘that which ACTUALLY
EXISTS and deterministically causes THE TRAUMA - [the nail or the […]

In a message dated 28/09/2006 _artefact at t-online.de_
(mailto:artefact@t-online.de) writes: Cologne 28-Sep-2006
JUD EVANS: Please note as usual - the caps are for emphasis only.
JUD EVANS: [earlier]
It depends in what sense and in what circumstances the significations are
employed. Sometimes the word *one* is used as an alternative first person
pronoun in such […]

Jud,
I don�t think you responded to this, so I thought I�d resend it.
Kevin Winters
_____
From: heidegger-bounces at soca.ecu.edu.au
[mailto:heidegger-bounces@soca.ecu.edu.au] On Behalf Of Kevin Winters
Sent: Wednesday, September 06, 2006 9:31 PM
To: ‘Discussions pertaining to the philosophy of Martin Heidegger’
Subject: RE: Heideggerian Truth
Jud,
An interesting response, though not very surprising as I anticipated many […]

In a message dated 28/09/2006 10:37:05 GMT Standard Time, Bernx at aol.com
writes:
In a message dated 9/27/2006 6:06:16 PM Eastern Daylight Time,
GEVANS613 at aol.com writes:
(1) A typical intrusive impingement would be a deterministic coupling of
[say] causal object (a) - a rusty nail, and causal object (b) a human big toe.
(2) A typical intrinsic impingement […]

Cologne 28-Sep-2006
GEVANS613 at aol.com schrieb Tue, 26 Sep 2006 13:12:59 EDT:
> In a message dated 26/09/2006 11:20:12 GMT Standard Time,
> artefact at t-online.de writes: Cologne 27-Sep-2006
> JUD EVANS:[on Socrates] As usual he doesn’t know what he is talking
> about. EVERYTHING in the cosmos is itself one in itself.
> DR. ELDRED:But how can that […]

In a message dated 9/27/2006 6:06:16 PM Eastern Daylight Time,
GEVANS613 at aol.com writes:
(1) A typical intrusive impingement would be a deterministic coupling of
[say] causal object (a) - a rusty nail, and causal object (b) a human big toe.
(2) A typical intrinsic impingement would be a deterministic coupling of
[say] causal object (c) - a metastatic […]

In a message dated 27/09/2006
_Bernx at aol.com_ (mailto:Bernx@aol.com) writes: In a message dated 9/27/2006
_GEVANS613 at aol.com_ (mailto:GEVANS613@aol.com) writes:
*Sensation, sensitivity, the senses* etc., are a myth - the do not exist at
all and are a just another bum product of the priestly masturbatoriums of the
Dark Ages. What exists is the […]