Heidegger

Cologne 28-Oct-2006
Kevin Winters schrieb Fri, 27 Oct 2006 09:12:52 -0700:
> I found the following in _What is Called Thinking?_, the first lecture
> Heidegger gave following his involvement with Nazism. The context is his
> talking about Nietzsche’s Ubermensch.
>
> “Nietzsche’s thinking gives expression to something that already exists but
> is still concealed from current views. We […]

Cologne 28-Oct-2006
michaelP schrieb Sat, 28 Oct 2006 05:40:44 +0100:
> Ken’th:
> > A duck went into a bar and asked for some crackers. The waiter said no. The
> > next day he came into the bar and asked for crackers again. The waiter said
> > no, again. The next day he came in again and […]

Ken’th:
> A duck went into a bar and asked for some crackers. The waiter said no. The
> next day he came into the bar and asked for crackers again. The waiter said
> no, again. The next day he came in again and asked for crackers. The waiter
> said no. The next day the waiter […]

A duck went into a bar and asked for some crackers. The waiter said no. The
next day he came into the bar and asked for crackers again. The waiter said
no, again. The next day he came in again and asked for crackers. The waiter
said no. The next day the waiter said if you ask for […]

In a message dated 27/10/2006 23:17:00 GMT Standard Time, Bernx at aol.com
writes:
In a message dated 10/27/2006 12:30:16 PM Eastern Daylight Time,
GEVANS613 at aol.com writes:
JUD EVANS:
The eliminative determinist does not employ the very process of
‘abstraction’ in order to utter the serious charge of ‘abstraction!’
for neither *process* nor *abstraction exist. The ideating eliminative
determinist operates […]

In a message dated 10/27/2006 6:44:35 PM Eastern Daylight Time,
bookwright at bogvaerker.dk writes:
JUD EVANS:
AT LAST! The dog then is religion - for the bankers, financiers, financial
speculators and the military-industrial complex and almost all quite ordinary
people, Muslims included, who work in all these industries in the WEST
[certainly in religion-blighted USA anyway] are Christians, and the […]

— Bookwright wrote:
> Philosophy: the love of wisdom
> i.e. love
> wisdom
Love, in the Heraclitean sense: http://enowning.blogspot.com/2004/10/wha…

Philosophy: the love of wisdom
i.e. love
wisdom

On 27 Oct 2006, at 14:25, GEVANS613 at aol.com wrote:
> In a message dated 27/10/2006 12:32:26 GMT Standard Time,
> bookwright at bogvaerker.dk writes:
>
>
> ABDASSAMAD CLARKE:
> Jud, you are almost entirely arguing with a phantom of your own
> creation. You rant about killing, and I have never even once
> suggested that anyone should be killed. […]

In a message dated 10/27/2006 12:30:16 PM Eastern Daylight Time,
GEVANS613 at aol.com writes:
JUD EVANS:
The eliminative determinist does not employ the very process of ‘abstraction’
in order to utter the serious charge of ‘abstraction!’
for neither *process* nor *abstraction exist. The ideating eliminative
determinist operates in an existential modality of criticising when he charges the
interlocutor with the silliness […]