Heidegger

On 27 Oct 2006, at 13:55, Anthony Crifasi wrote:
> —– Original Message —– From: “Bookwright”
>
>
>
>> On 27 Oct 2006, at 08:23, Anthony Crifasi wrote:
>>
>> Obviously you dismiss the argument that the US itself is one of
>> the main creators of turmoil on the planet, overturning
>> democratically elected governments
>
> Which of the following three […]

In article , Kevin
Winters writes
>I’ve been spending some time working on an interlinear _Being and Time_,
>both as a study tool and some German practice. I found the online version of
>the German text and am using that (have a hard copy for Heidegger’s marginal
>notes), but I was curious if anyone knows of or possesses […]

In a message dated 27/10/2006 14:49:18 GMT Standard Time,
michael at sandwich-de-sign.co.uk writes:
Crossing the line — from being to beings, from the infinite to the finite,
the absolute to the relative, freedom to compulsion, the universal to the
singular, _theoria_ to _praxis_, from vita contemplativa to vita activa — is a
perilous undertaking. And Heidegger came […]

Besinnung.
Immediate death probably was a factor in its delayed publication.
— michaelP wrote:
> Besinnung? I haven’t read any of that text before today; it seems similar in
> tone to Contributions. The questioning seems so fecund, so fundamental, and
> so radical in its answering sway to the pop-vulgarity of Hitler’s
> “attitudinal” quote. Such questioning would […]

I found the following in _What is Called Thinking?_, the first lecture
Heidegger gave following his involvement with Nazism. The context is his
talking about Nietzsche’s Ubermensch.
“Nietzsche’s thinking gives expression to something that already exists but
is still concealed from current views. We may assume, then, that here and
there, still invisible to the public eye, the superman […]

Besinnung? I haven’t read any of that text before today; it seems similar in
tone to Contributions. The questioning seems so fecund, so fundamental, and
so radical in its answering sway to the pop-vulgarity of Hitler’s
“attitudinal” quote. Such questioning would be put to immediate death by any
nazi I can think of (if they could even sniff […]

> That Pete:
>> Small wonder he would resign his position six months later, and return to
>> teaching.
MichaelE:
> Whereupon one of Heidegger’s associates (I forget which one at the moment –
Max
> Müller?) quipped, “Back from Syracuse?”.
>
> Crossing the line — from being to beings, from the infinite to the finite,
the
> absolute to the relative, freedom […]

Yesterday Hans Blix said:
….the situation would have been better if the war had not taken place.
“Saddam would still have been sitting in office. Okay, that is negative and
it would not have been joyful for the Iraqi people. But what we have gotten
is undoubtedly worse.”
 http://www.int.iol.co.za/index.php?set_i…)
Iraqis said:
QUESTION TO IRAQIS: THINKING ABOUT ANY HARDSHIPS YOU MIGHT HAVE […]

In a message dated 27/10/2006 12:32:26 GMT Standard Time,
_bookwright at bogvaerker.dk_ (mailto:bookwright@bogvaerker.dk) writes:
ABDASSAMAD CLARKE:
Jud, you are almost entirely arguing with a phantom of your own creation.
You rant about killing, and I have never even once suggested that anyone
should be killed. Indeed I have written in this exchange that the madness […]

—– Original Message —–
From: “Bookwright”
> On 27 Oct 2006, at 08:23, Anthony Crifasi wrote:
>
> Obviously you dismiss the argument that the US itself is one of the main
> creators of turmoil on the planet, overturning democratically elected
> governments
Which of the following three “axis of evil” leaders were democratically
elected:
1. Kim Jong Il
2. […]