Heidegger

Dear Tympan:
[Corbin]: However, when the term refers to Platonic Ideas, it is almost always
accompanied by this precise qualification: mothol (plural of mithal)
aflatuniya
nuraniya, the “Platonic archetypes of light.” When the term refers to the
world
of the eighth climate, it designates technically, on one hand, the
Archetype-Images of individual and singular things; in this case, it relates
to the
eastern […]

However, when the term refers to Platonic Ideas, it is almost always
accompanied by this precise qualification: mothol (plural of mithal)
aflatuniya
nuraniya, the “Platonic archetypes of light.” When the term refers to the
world
of the eighth climate, it designates technically, on one hand, the
Archetype-Images of individual and singular things; in this case, it relates
to the
eastern region of […]

In a message dated 30/01/2007 21:57:14 GMT Standard Time,
artefact at t-online.de writes:
Cologne 30-Jan-2007
“Der Tod, wenn wir jene Unwirklichkeit so nennen wollen, ist das
Furchtbarste, und das Todte festzuhalten, das, was die größte Kraft
erfordert. Aber nicht das Leben, das sich vor dem Tode scheut und von
der Verwüstung rein bewahrt, sondern das ihn erträgt und […]

Cologne 30-Jan-2007
“Der Tod, wenn wir jene Unwirklichkeit so nennen wollen, ist das
Furchtbarste, und das Todte festzuhalten, das, was die größte Kraft
erfordert. Aber nicht das Leben, das sich vor dem Tode scheut und von
der Verwüstung rein bewahrt, sondern das ihn erträgt und in ihm sich
erhält, ist das Leben des Geistes. Er gewinnt seine Wahrheit nur, […]

Tympan Segment wrote:
A brief refrain:
I wonder whether talk of Heidegger’s neologisms is not an obvious
diversion from underscoring his thinking proper, whether it is a spectacular
straw
man. It seems to me now here that Heidegger’s neologisms and hyphenated
(old) logisms are partly erected to avoid richly metaphorical language
endemic of traditional philosophies and thus the metaphysics he […]

Tympan Segment wrote:
A brief refrain:
I wonder whether talk of Heidegger’s neologisms is not an obvious
diversion
from underscoring his thinking proper, whether it is a spectacular straw
man. It seems to me now here that Heidegger’s neologisms and hyphenated
(old) logisms are partly erected to avoid richly metaphorical language
endemic of traditional philosophies and thus the metaphysics he is
straining
against […]

In a message dated 29/01/2007 11:23:19 GMT Standard Time, m.riddoch at ecu.edu.au writes:
Forwarded for “Les Smith” _leesmithjr at comporium.net_ (mailto:leesmithjr@comporium.net) Jud: Sorry but badmash gundar Osho’s trite *Little Stories for Little People* is acceptable prose but ontologically utter rubbish. […]

Forwarded for “Les Smith”
Death is always close by. It is almost like your shadow. You may be aware, you may not be aware, but it follows you from the first moment of your life to the very last moment. Death is a process just as life is […]

On 29/01/2007, at 11:04 AM, Philip Baker wrote:
> Since I hardly ever visit http://heidegger.an-archos.com
> I have only just realised that visitors to the site
> (presumably including non-list members) are invited to
> post comments to posts made to this list and archived on
> the site. Those web site posts appear on the site but do
> not get […]

Since I hardly ever visit http://heidegger.an-archos.com
I have only just realised that visitors to the site
(presumably including non-list members) are invited to
post comments to posts made to this list and archived on
the site. Those web site posts appear on the site but do
not get emailed to list members. Thus there is a
confusing mix of communication and non-communication
going […]