Heidegger

—–Oorspronkelijk bericht—–
Van: heidegger-bounces at an-archos.com [mailto:heidegger-bounces@an-archos.com]Namens GEVANS613 at aol.com
Verzonden: woensdag 27 juni 2007 22:29
Aan: heidegger at an-archos.com
Onderwerp: Re: Reificational Rollercoaster (Così fan tutte)
never mind gets *over-familiar* with them?
Jud:
Beautifully said Renekins - it looks like the consolation of philosophy has finally delivered your well-deserved bonus. Have you been reading Boethius Alain de Botton or […]

In a message dated 27/06/2007 _michael at sandwich-de-sign.co.uk_
(mailto:michael@sandwich-de-sign.co.uk) writes:
CONTINUATION.
Of skinhead-culture spilling over into the domain of serious philosophy.
MichaelP writes:
Jud, Also, abstractions are the result of a previously or ongoing collective
mounting of an abstraction or extraction process, which (at least for
MichaelE) is the very foundation of philosophical concept formation (or any […]

Cologne 28-Jun-2007
michaelP schrieb Mon, 25 Jun 2007 11:50:10 +0100:
> ME:
> > The insight that identity is always an identity of identiy and
> > difference is one of the deepest ontological insights that we have
> > already from Plato.
>
> Michael, is this insight also that of Heraclitus when he makes of be-ing
> that it be […]

In a message dated 27/06/2007 20:47:33 GMT Standard Time,
michael at sandwich-de-sign.co.uk writes:
Says Jud:
> To reify is to ‘thingify’: to treat an abstraction as a material thing. I
> find such behaviour most unscholarly and unprofessional ’Äì the equivalent
> of skinhead-culture spilling over into the domain of serious philosophy.
MichaelP writes:
Jud,
reification and […]

In a message dated 27/06/2007 17:19:10 GMT Standard Time,
_R.B.M.deBakker at uva.nl_ (mailto:R.B.M.deBakker@uva.nl) writes:
Renekins Writes:
With all philosophizers it is clear, but Jud makes it even more clear: they
kick the beast while riding it.
Jud:
Some beasts need kicking and the only way to administer the kick is from
above [or better still from the inside] […]

Says Jud:
> To reify is to ‘thingify’: to treat an abstraction as a material thing. I
> find such behaviour most unscholarly and unprofessional ’Äì the equivalent
> of skinhead-culture spilling over into the domain of serious philosophy.
Jud, reification and thingification are surely synonyms, but neither
necesarily means to treat abstractions as material things: why the
restriction to […]

In a message dated 6/26/2007 4:29:44 PM Eastern Daylight Time,
tgeorgescu at home.nl writes:
could not understand reading it if Orwell was pro or against
totalitarianism, for I saw in his book reasons to support both the thesis
and the anti-thesis. He is anti-totalitarian in the literal meaning of
what’s written there and in the sketch of the plot, but […]

With all philosophizers it is clear, but Jud makes it even more clear: they kick the beast while riding it.
The ontology of things as that which is real, was developed by Aristotle, in reaction to Plato’s doctrine of the common ideai as real reality. Without it, no science, not even the idea of […]

> —–Oorspronkelijk bericht—–
> Van: heidegger-bounces at an-archos.com [mailto:heidegger-bounces@an-
>archos.com] Namens Michael Eldred
> Verzonden: vrijdag 22 juni 2007 18:01
> Aan: Heidegger, An-archos
> Onderwerp: Re: lunar owners - self and other
>
> Cologne 22-Jun-2007
>
> Bernx at aol.com schrieb Thu, 21 Jun 2007 18:17:55 EDT:
>
> > In a message dated 6/21/2007 1:41:30 PM Eastern Daylight Time,
> > michael at […]

An internet correspondent, Dr. Dan Watkins, confessed that he loves
democracy for the wrong reasons.
I realize now that all my critique of democracy on this and other lists is
morally neutral. Seeing the faults of a system does not necessarily mean one
has to hate it. In fact, by enlarging the area of one’s understanding, one’s
ability to […]