Heidegger

—–Oorspronkelijk bericht—–
Van: heidegger-bounces at an-archos.com
[mailto:heidegger-bounces@an-archos.com]Namens michaelP
Verzonden: maandag 23 juli 2007 19:52
Aan: Discussions pertaining to the philosophy of Martin Heidegger
Onderwerp: in the beginning…
rene wrote this recently:
> Anthony, you cannot say that you have not been warned as to the
> growing one-sidedness of your contributions.
>
> Meanwhile i have since then been discussing Aristotle and me […]

In a message dated 7/28/2007 9:43:36 PM Eastern Daylight Time,
tgeorgescu at home.nl writes:
> Tudor;
> Your statement makes you very much a part of politics.
> Sincerely,
> Bernard
It took me some time to find the answer to this objection.
Naisbitt (in Megatrends or Megatrends 2000) said that “we have leadership,
but there is no followership”. I have to […]

> I think your analysis is way out of line. It is religion that is the
> evil in our midst, not politics - politics is the handmaiden of
> religion - look at Bush - look at the Christian Catholic reptile
> Blair… look wherever you like.
Well, Jud, the problem is that prof. Dick Swaab, in […]

 http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Criticisms_…
GEVANS613 at aol.com wrote:
> The Islamists have quite openly stated that they wish to install a world
> wide Caliphate - the Hindus slaughtered millions of Moslems during the
> partition of India and vice versa. The death count in Northern Ireland
> Protestant-Catholic assassinations during the troubles has been
> horrific. Since
> 1969, the provincial death toll has […]

In a message dated 29/07/2007 02:43:36 GMT Standard Time,
_tgeorgescu at home.nl_ (mailto:tgeorgescu@home.nl) writes:
Bernard:
Tudor; Your statement makes you very much a part of politics. Sincerely,
Bernard
Tudor:
It took me some time to find the answer to this objection.
Naisbitt (in Megatrends or Megatrends 2000) said that “we have leadership,
but there is no followership”. I have to […]

> Can someone direct me to a post(s) in the archives where Rene worked out
> the precise Science/Philosophy relationship in terms of the former’s
limitations.
>
> As I recall, mP was compiling a dB of salient H-list writings … mP?
>
> I trust this mail finds everyone well,
> Bob
Hi Bob, I haven’t so much a ’salient’ database […]

Can someone direct me to a post(s) in the archives where Rene worked out the precise Science/Philosophy relationship in terms of the former’s limitations.
As I recall, mP was compiling a dB of salient H-list writings … mP?
I trust this mail finds everyone well,
Bob

> Tudor;
> Your statement makes you very much a part of politics.
> Sincerely,
> Bernard
It took me some time to find the answer to this objection.
Naisbitt (in Megatrends or Megatrends 2000) said that “we have leadership,
but there is no followership”. I have to say that in the Western world there
is an inflation of leadership. Too […]

In a message dated 7/27/2007 12:16:12 PM Eastern Daylight Time,
artefact at t-online.de writes:
Cologne 27-Jul-2007
ME: The weakness in Heidegger’s interpretation of Aristotle’s key
concepts of _dynamis_, _energeia_ and _entelecheia_ is far simpler and
therefore much harder to see. viz. that the metaphysical concept of
_dynamis_ depends essentially on there being a SINGLE _archae_, rather
than a dyadic ontological structure, which […]

Cologne 27-Jul-2007
Bernx at aol.com schrieb Fri, 27 Jul 2007 06:10:03 EDT:
> In a message dated 7/26/2007 12:03:20 PM Eastern Daylight Time,
> artefact at t-online.de writes:
>
> ….As I say in another article, Heidegger insists on
> tarrying at the
> […]