Heidegger

In a message dated 10/30/2007 11:19:42 AM Eastern Daylight Time,
artefact at t-online.de writes:
ME: I didn’t claim, “the ego came into being with Cartesian
metaphysics”. I said, “The ego first became subject in modern
(Cartesian) metaphysics,” and that “as the posited
fundamentum absolutum”.
BXB:Yes, of course, Michael. I appreciate the difference. I find, however,
that expressing this as “the ego first […]

—–Oorspronkelijk bericht—–
Van: heidegger-bounces at an-archos.com [mailto:heidegger-bounces@an-archos.com]Namens Bernx at aol.com
Verzonden: maandag 29 oktober 2007 23:41
Aan: heidegger at an-archos.com
CC: Bernx at aol.com; gbovasso850 at comcast.net
Onderwerp: Re: The Oddness of the OD*
In a message dated 10/29/2007 10:21:49 AM Eastern Daylight Time, R.B.M.deBakker at uva.nl writes:
…..before Descartes, without Descartes, the subject has not yet discovered itself, ‘is’ not yet. […]

says joe:
> it is very difficult
> to construct construct sentences where the subject is an inanimate
> object and the verb is reflexive. one possible example: global warming
> is a self-correcting phenomenon because it will trigger an ice age. or
> maybe I should say ‘the earth self-corrects climate disturbances’
i should say that almost any ‘interesting’ […]

MichaelE to Joe recntly:
> And, as I pointed out in my last
> post, the ink-blot’s showing of itself AS such is enabled by the category of
> SOMETHING, a phenomenon the Greek philosophers could still see, but we
> smarties today, blinded by Cartesian and British empiricist prejudice, no
> longer can see.
Michael, I can see […]

Cologne 30-Oct-2007
Michael Eldred schrieb:
> Cologne 26-Oct-2007
>
> Joseph Polanik schrieb Thu, 25 Oct 2007 06:48:45 -0400:
>
> > Michael Eldred wrote:
> >
> > >ME: For Heidegger (and presumably for anyone thinking on it), anything
> > >at all that ‘is’ is a being, an entity.
> >
> > Okay, then. Heidegger’s vocabulary does, in fact, have […]

Cologne 31-Oct-2007
Bernx at aol.com schrieb Mon, 29 Oct 2007 23:59:26 EDT:
> In a message dated 10/29/2007 1:02:40 PM Eastern Daylight Time,
> artefact at t-online.de writes:
>
> Cologne 29-Oct-2007
>
> Bernx at aol.com schrieb Sun, 28 Oct 2007 21:48:37 EDT:
>
> > […]

—–Oorspronkelijk bericht—–
Van: heidegger-bounces at an-archos.com [mailto:heidegger-bounces@an-archos.com]Namens Anthony Crifasi
Verzonden: maandag 29 oktober 2007 18:41
Aan: Discussions pertaining to the philosophy of Martin Heidegger
Onderwerp: Re: The Oddness of the OD
On 10/29/07, Bakker, R.B.M. de wrote:
The conclusion of the discussion of Aristotle’s distinction physis-techne, was that the sense of being
attributed to physis: being-of-itself, is to be thought completely […]

In a message dated 10/29/2007 1:02:40 PM Eastern Daylight Time,
artefact at t-online.de writes:
Cologne 29-Oct-2007
Bernx at aol.com schrieb Sun, 28 Oct 2007 21:48:37 EDT:
> In a message dated 10/28/2007 6:13:22 PM Eastern Daylight Time,
> artefact at t-online.de writes:
>
> Heidegger often renders “phenomenon”, “das Phänomen” as “das
> […]

In a message dated 10/29/2007 10:21:49 AM Eastern Daylight Time,
R.B.M.deBakker at uva.nl writes:
…..before Descartes, without Descartes, the subject has not yet discovered
itself, ‘is’ not yet. Remaining on this
simple level - which is very much advisable - , the conclusion would be,
that before Descartes nothing
was. But also the nothing is not accepted by technological […]

Cologne 29-Oct-2007
Bernx at aol.com schrieb Sun, 28 Oct 2007 21:48:37 EDT:
> In a message dated 10/28/2007 6:13:22 PM Eastern Daylight Time,
> artefact at t-online.de writes:
>
> Heidegger often renders “phenomenon”, “das Phänomen” as “das
> Sichzeigende”,
> i.e. literally “that which […]