Heidegger

>How many times have I had to point out to you that a modus tollens
>hypothetically presupposes what will be contradicted in the end? So
>that a modus tollens against the reality of myself will therefore
>presuppose myself in order to then contradict its reality? Instead, you
>inexplicably take contradiction as “self-refuting,” ignoring precisely
>how […]

>Anthony Crifasi wrote:
>>In your post of 2008-04-03, you acknowledged that you were trying to
>>disprove the assumption that one may not attribute predicates to
>>nothingness.
>>for the benefit of future googlers, the relevance of this assumption
>>is quite simply this: having established ‘I am’ have I established
>>’I am not nothing’? well, […]

hi all and sundry, just wondering whether TheList has gone all the way down
once more or just whether the magnetic field is not strong enough for a
discursive charge… the myth of er (at least Plato’s take on it in
‘Politea’) has begun to attract my musical attention with the three
sirens/fates singing their songs of temporality; […]

>Joe to Ant:
>
>> you seem to be puzzled by the way language users use the same word time
>> and again even though the referent changes (however slightly) over time.
>>
>> take the word ‘chair’. I use this word to denote my chair day after day
>> even though the changes constantly. The […]

GEVANS613 at aol.com wrote:
> In a message dated 24/04/2008 13:43:19 GMT Standard Time,
> crifasian at gmail.com writes:
>
> Googlers of Joseph Polanik, you’ll really want to take a look at this
> post - it’s the best illustration of all of what everyone on every
> Google discussion group to which he’s posted says […]

In a message dated 24/04/2008 13:43:19 GMT Standard Time,
crifasian at gmail.com writes:
Googlers of Joseph Polanik, you’ll really want to take a look at this
post - it’s the best illustration of all of what everyone on every
Google discussion group to which he’s posted says about him. (Test that
out by doing a […]

Joe to Ant:
> you seem to be puzzled by the way language users use the same word time
> and again even though the referent changes (however slightly) over time.
>
> take the word ‘chair’. I use this word to denote my chair day after day
> even though the changes constantly. The fabric is getting worn, […]

Googlers of Joseph Polanik, you’ll really want to take a look at this
post - it’s the best illustration of all of what everyone on every
Google discussion group to which he’s posted says about him. (Test that
out by doing a search of them.)
Joseph Polanik wrote:
> >Joseph, why did you separate my premise that identity […]

>Joseph, why did you separate my premise that identity is a necessary
>condition of self-existence, from the further argument that I gave for
>that premise … when you separate my premises from the reasons I give
>for them, then yes, they’ll look pretty weak.
I haven’t separated two claims:
1. the claim that your premise […]

——– Original Message ——–
Betreff: Re: earliest references to “Analytic-Continental” division?
Datum: Mon, 21 Apr 2008 18:42:53 +0200
Von: Michael Eldred
Rückantwort: artefact at web.de
Firma: http://www.webcom.com/artefact/
An: “Heidegger, An-archos”
Referenzen:
Cologne 21-Apr-2008
Anthony Crifasi schrieb Sat, 19 Apr 2008 09:23:17 -0500:
> Someone on another discussion list is looking for the earliest
> references to the division between “analytic philosophy” and
> “continental philosophy” (those specific […]