Heidegger

> —–Original Message—–
> From: heidegger-bounces at an-archos.com [mailto:heidegger-bounces@an-
>archos.com] On Behalf Of Anthony Crifasi
> Sent: Saturday, May 24, 2008 6:55 PM
> To: Discussions pertaining to the philosophy of Martin Heidegger
> Subject: Re: Joseph Polanik the continuing game player
>
> Bob Guevara wrote:
>
> >> —–Original Message—–
> >> From: heidegger-bounces at an-archos.com [mailto:heidegger-bounces@an-
> >>archos.com] On Behalf Of Anthony Crifasi
> […]

> —–Original Message—–
> From: heidegger-bounces at an-archos.com [mailto:heidegger-bounces@an-
>archos.com] On Behalf Of Anthony Crifasi
> Sent: Saturday, May 24, 2008 11:14 AM
> To: Discussions pertaining to the philosophy of Martin Heidegger
> Subject: Re: Joseph Polanik the continuing game player
>
> Evasive answering isn’t the most adolescent attribute for an
> intellectual. That prize goes to not answering at […]

Bob Guevara wrote:
>> —–Original Message—–
>> From: heidegger-bounces at an-archos.com [mailto:heidegger-bounces@an-
>>archos.com] On Behalf Of Anthony Crifasi
>> Sent: Saturday, May 24, 2008 11:14 AM
>> To: Discussions pertaining to the philosophy of Martin Heidegger
>> Subject: Re: Joseph Polanik the continuing game player
>>
>> Evasive answering isn’t the most adolescent attribute for an
>> intellectual. That prize goes to not […]

continued
The power of the Cartesian extortion lies in its ability to keep us in
line by telling us that doubts about the mind lead inevitably to crude
materialism. Heidegger sidesteps this move by suggesting that not
only mind but matter as well is a theoretical construct with no
indispensable
role to play in making sense of the everyday life-world. […]

The Cambridge Companion to
HEIDEGGER
Edited by Charles B. Guignon
(from: Introduction - CHARLES B. GUIGNON)
[.]P6
The question of being is therefore reformulated as a question
about the conditions for the accessibility or intelligibility of things.
The constant references to Kant in the essays that follow (especially
in those by Hoy, Dostal, and Frede) show how this project can be
seen as […]

> I await basic reciprocity on your part.
Howdy Anthony,
Do you really?

Evasive answering isn’t the most adolescent attribute for an
intellectual. That prize goes to not answering at all. So he’s
preferable to some here.
Bob Guevara wrote:
>> I await basic reciprocity on your part.
>
> Howdy Anthony,
>
> Do you really?
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> heidegger mailing list
> heidegger at an-archos.com
> http://an-archos.com/mailman/listinfo/he…
> http://heidegger.an-archos.com/
>

Tudor Georgescu wrote:
> >Sorry to intrude. I did not follow your discussion, but I think I
> >already have an objection. It pertains to the title of the dispute.
>
> >It says “schizo-epistemology”. I think that Heidegger’s epistemology
> >(if any) is monophrenic. But not in the psychotherapeutic meaning, but
> >it means […]

Joseph Polanik wrote:
> Tudor Georgescu wrote:
>
> >Sorry to intrude. I did not follow your discussion, but I think I
> >already have an objection. It pertains to the title of the dispute.
>
> >It says “schizo-epistemology”. I think that Heidegger’s epistemology
> >(if any) is monophrenic. But not in the psychotherapeutic meaning, but
> […]

Tudor Georgescu wrote:
>Sorry to intrude. I did not follow your discussion, but I think I
>already have an objection. It pertains to the title of the dispute.
>It says “schizo-epistemology”. I think that Heidegger’s epistemology
>(if any) is monophrenic. But not in the psychotherapeutic meaning, but
>it means “one mind”, namely that spirit […]