Heidegger

MichaelE:
> >ME. Not everybody tries to assert that nothing can be predicated of
> >nothingness, and I have shown how you contradict yourself in the
> >attempt to do so.
JoeP:
> you have shown (to your own satisfaction, of course) that *any* effort
> (not just my effort) to formally disallow the predication of
> nothing(ness) […]

HNA: Unacknowleged Consequences
Michael Eldred wrote:
>Joseph Polanik schrieb Thu, 19 Jun 2008 05:59:34 -0400:
>>Michael Eldred wrote:
>>>Joseph Polanik schrieb Sat, 14 Jun 2008 08:04:32 -0400:
>>>>Michael Eldred wrote:
>>>>>Joseph Polanik schrieb Wed, 04 Jun 2008 06:47:07 -0400:
>>>>>>Michael Eldred wrote:
>>>>>>JP: you are contradicting yourself. above you that I have avoided
>>>>>>predicating ‘nothing’ […]

In a message dated 6/25/2008 3:56:14 PM Eastern Daylight Time,
GEVANS613 at aol.com writes:
In a message dated 25/06/2008 20:01:49 GMT Standard Time, Bernx at aol.com
writes:
In a message dated 6/25/2008 12:06:19 PM Eastern Daylight Time,
artefact at t-online.de writes:
ME: You insist on applying the wrong measure to philosophical questions. That
gets you nowhere, i.e. it leaves you where […]

In a message dated 25/06/2008 20:01:49 GMT Standard Time, Bernx at aol.com
writes:
In a message dated 6/25/2008 12:06:19 PM Eastern Daylight Time,
artefact at t-online.de writes:
ME: You insist on applying the wrong measure to philosophical questions. That
gets you nowhere, i.e. it leaves you where you are with an unshakeable belief
in formal logic.
No, Michael, that […]

In a message dated 6/25/2008 12:06:19 PM Eastern Daylight Time,
artefact at t-online.de writes:
ME: You insist on applying the wrong measure to philosophical questions. That
gets you nowhere, i.e. it leaves you where you are with an unshakeable belief
in formal logic.
No, Michael, that leaves him with an “unshakeable” (qua unconscious) “belief”
in formal pre-logical magic.
Bernard
**************Gas prices getting you […]

Cologne 25-Jun-2008
Joseph Polanik schrieb Thu, 19 Jun 2008 05:59:34 -0400:
> Michael Eldred wrote:
>
> >Joseph Polanik schrieb Sat, 14 Jun 2008 08:04:32 -0400:
>
> >>Michael Eldred wrote:
>
> >>>Joseph Polanik schrieb Wed, 04 Jun 2008 06:47:07 -0400:
>
> >>>>Michael Eldred wrote:
>
> >>>>JP: you are contradicting yourself. above you that I have avoided
> […]

In a message dated 6/21/2008 11:21:18 AM Eastern Daylight Time,
GEVANS613 at aol.com writes:
WHAT AM I?
Better than that. Reading a book without knowing its context of author’s
achievements and Weltanschauung often, if not always leads to put erroneous
constructions on some assertions. Best example is “I think, therefore I am” of
Descartes. Unprepared reading gives on the one […]

Michael Eldred wrote:
>Joseph Polanik schrieb Sat, 14 Jun 2008 08:04:32 -0400:
>>Michael Eldred wrote:
>>>Joseph Polanik schrieb Wed, 04 Jun 2008 06:47:07 -0400:
>>>>Michael Eldred wrote:
>>>>JP: you are contradicting yourself. above you that I have avoided
>>>>predicating ‘nothing’ by defining it away and that I have made the
>>>>problem vanish by using […]

WHAT AM I?
Better than that. Reading a book without knowing its context of author’s
achievements and Weltanschauung often, if not always leads to put erroneous
constructions on some assertions. Best example is “I think, therefore I am” of
Descartes. Unprepared reading gives on the one hand the impression of “thinking”
having some mysterious ontological power of creating […]

Cologne 17-Jun-2008
Friends of philosophy,
Here is one new article:
1.) Absolutely Divine Everyday: Tracing Heidegger’s thinking on
godliness -
With an appendix on Aristotle’s purely energetic god of the fair
Paper presented to the conference Heidegger und Religion in Messkirch,
04-07 June 2008. The appendix endeavours to rethink Aristotle’s famous
god in his Metaphysics.
 http://home.tiscali.de/artefact/untpltcl…
or http://192.220.96.165/untpltcl/absdvnev….
and one revised article (Version 3.0)
2.) Why social […]