Heidegger

Jud,
you have often indicated that you classify Heidegger as a
transcendentalist; and, recently you wrote: “Heidegger is simply
religion with *God* removed and *Being* shoved in”.
however, there is little indication that Heidegger believed that the
human individual is a being in a body (where ‘being’ would refer to an
immaterial soul or some other transcendent entity).
in the notation […]

In a message dated 27/09/2008 20:08:00 GMT Standard Time, Bernx at aol.com
writes:
In any case, wearing of the dunce cap is the same as donning a “God cap” to
conceal the bald spot of the Mind. No doubt that bald spot is our “eye of
God” rear view mirror to warn of the bugger […]

In a message dated 9/27/2008 3:13:24 PM Eastern Daylight Time,
GEVANS613 at aol.com writes:
In a message dated 27/09/2008 20:08:00 GMT Standard Time, Bernx at aol.com
writes:
In any case, wearing of the dunce cap is the same as donning a “God cap” to
conceal the bald spot of the Mind. No doubt that bald spot is our “eye […]

In a message dated 9/27/2008 8:27:14 AM Eastern Daylight Time,
GEVANS613 at aol.com writes:
In a message dated 26/09/2008 22:08:20 GMT Standard Time, Bernx at aol.com
writes:
[B] Indicated in that case is the state of para-nous. However, no sooner
besides or out of your own mind than the gap is filled by “they.” That would
resolve as an identification […]

Supportitive Spam
Hello Again,
I click *Send Now* and go to check my incoming e-mail and what do I find
already?
Unexpected spam arrives, apparently to back up my claim that it is not
*energy* that exists - but the energised object.
=========================================================================
AOL Users, Please click on show images and enable in the yellow bar above,
Or you […]

A CONVERSATION WITH GEORGES METANOMSKI - PART 2
I26/09/2008
Georges writes:
Many, many thanks Jud.
It’s not a reply to your post. That will come after the second part and will
take some time. I just would like to draw your attention to two places,
where you got IMO wrong.
1. Very marginal, but not insignificant, the danger of […]

In a message dated 26/09/2008 22:08:20 GMT Standard Time, Bernx at aol.com
writes:
[B] Indicated in that case is the state of para-nous. However, no sooner
besides or out of your own mind than the gap is filled by “they.” That would
resolve as an identification with the collective mind. Unnoticed in such a quasi
pathologism […]

In a message dated 26/09/2008 23:22:45 GMT Standard Time,
_tgeorgescu at home.nl_ (mailto:tgeorgescu@home.nl) writes:
[B]
The inauthentic life must remain identified with the oligarchal “I Am.” But
this state is in fact furthered by the Heideggerian principle of dasein where
the singular value is placed “out there in the world” as the exclusive place
or space of […]

In a message dated 26/09/2008 22:46:19 GMT Standard Time,
_tgeorgescu at home.nl_ (mailto:tgeorgescu@home.nl) writes:
—–Original Message—– From: _heidegger-bounces at an-archos.com_
(mailto:heidegger-bounces@an-archos.com) [mailto: _heidegger-bounces@an_
(mailto:heidegger-bounces@an) - archos.com] On Behalf Of _Bernx at aol.com_
(mailto:Bernx@aol.com) Sent: vrijdag 26 September 2008 23:26 To: _heidegger at an-archos.com_
(mailto:heidegger@an-archos.com) Subject: Re: Heidegger’s had it**..
In a message dated 9/25/2008 […]

In a message dated 26/09/2008 18:13:37 GMT Standard Time,
artefact at t-online.de writes:
Instead of relying on our deep-seated prejudices pro or con market
interplay, perhaps we could start think what it is.
Jud:
The problem is not one of starting to think what market
interplay is - but what money, value, profit, labour, etc., (reificatively)
isn’t.