Heidegger

In a message dated 3/25/2009 1:42:38 AM Eastern Daylight Time,
GEVANS613 at aol.com writes:
Beginnings are all relative to what has begun as a natural corollary of the
existential imperative - *that which is changeless* does not qualify as *a
that* for such *thats* could never exist in the first place.
Jud, the measure changelessness of *a that* is the […]

In a message dated 3/25/2009 1:42:43 AM Eastern Daylight Time,
GEVANS613 at aol.com writes:
Jud:
The way forward is not to abort reification as you suggest, but to simply
make people aware of it - elimination by education rather than education by
reification.
I suppose it depends upon whether the school master is an educator or a
propagandist. The latter is […]

In a message dated 22/03/2009 01:31:18 GMT Standard Time,
silicaceous at yahoo.com writes:
thanks for confirming the obvious, Bern,
chao,
john
— On Fri, 3/20/09, Bernx at aol.com wrote:
From: Bernx at aol.com
Subject: Re: OIKEIOSIS, PHRONESIS and EUDAIMONIA**
To: heidegger at an-archos.com
Cc: Bernx at aol.com
Date: Friday, March 20, 2009, 7:57 PM
In a message dated 3/20/2009 3:33:51 […]

In a message dated 22/03/2009 09:26:23 GMT Standard Time,
_gottlos752004 at yahoo.com_ (mailto:gottlos752004@yahoo.com) writes:
Snip
GARY C MOORE:
I would like to add, though, in a highly simplistic manner, *the observable*
is *what* one sees with the eyes [or rather, what is presented AS vision
instead of BY vision as if sight presented something else […]

In a message dated 3/21/2009 9:31:18 PM Eastern Daylight Time,
silicaceous at yahoo.com writes:
thanks for confirming the obvious, Bern,
chao,
john
Yeah, John, especially when the obvious is opaque to a cogitophiliac.
Bernard

thanks for confirming the obvious, Bern,
chao,
john
— On Fri, 3/20/09, Bernx at aol.com wrote:
From: Bernx at aol.com
Subject: Re: OIKEIOSIS, PHRONESIS and EUDAIMONIA**
To: heidegger at an-archos.com
Cc: Bernx at aol.com
Date: Friday, March 20, 2009, 7:57 PM
In a message dated 3/20/2009 3:33:51 AM Eastern Daylight Time, GEVANS613 at aol.com writes:
In a message dated 15/03/2009 15:13:40 […]

In a message dated 3/20/2009 3:33:51 AM Eastern Daylight Time,
GEVANS613 at aol.com writes:
In a message dated 15/03/2009 15:13:40 GMT Standard Time,
gottlos752004 at yahoo.com writes:
PHRONESIS
Hi Gary:
Thanks for all the Greek goodies. The account of the Stoic relish for
reification was very interesting. Reification is one of the gifts that the Greeks
and others (not to mention Plato […]

In a message dated 15/03/2009 15:13:40 GMT Standard Time,
gottlos752004 at yahoo.com writes:
PHRONESIS
Hi Gary:
Thanks for all the Greek goodies. The account of the Stoic relish for
reification was very interesting. Reification is one of the gifts that the Greeks
and others (not to mention Plato or: *Reificatrix Rex,* bequeathed to us.
It is still arguable whether […]

“I was wondering about how a serious reader of Heidegger could be so
impressed with the writings of Osho Rajneesh. Heidegger, a top intellectual,
should be the opposite of the anti-intellectual Osho.”

Sorry for the wrong name on the e-mail. Ziggo played with all e-mail settings.
Greetings,
Tudor
—– Origineel bericht —–
Van: “M.J. KEUTERMAN”
Datum: dinsdag, maart 17, 2009 6:45
Onderwerp: Heidegger and Osho Rajneesh
Aan: heidegger at an-archos.com
> I was wondering about how a serious reader of Heidegger could be so
> impressed with the writings of Osho Rajneesh. Heidegger, a top
> […]