Heidegger

Dear All,
Recently the Journal of Chinese Philosophy published an article by Jay Goulding
“Heidegger on East-West Dialogue: Anticipating the Event – By Lin Ma”. Can
one of you tell me what it is about and/or offer an online version?
yours,
Jan

>>says Allen (I think) very recently:
>>
>>> Hi Bernard,
>>>
>>> The crucial matter here is how you take Heidegger’s notion of possibility.
>>> For Heidegger, Dasein IS possibility; that is, possibility is the very
being
>>of Dasein. As such Dasein’s being is always yet to be accomplished. At
>>the same time, it is already […]

In a message dated 1/23/2010 2:53:55 PM Eastern Standard Time,
allen.scult at drake.edu writes:
In a message dated 1/22/2010 2:18:51 PM Eastern Standard Time,
allen.scult at drake.edu writes:
In a message dated 1/21/2010 6:38:55 PM Eastern Standard Time,
allen.scult at drake.edu writes:
>says Allen (I think) very recently:
>
>> Hi Bernard,
>>
>> The crucial matter here is how you take […]

Archetypes are no more, no less than ‘elements’ which taken together represent features of any and all,
in kind or in presentation,
and finally in ‘representation’
this is ’stasis’
and the “One on one”
here and there there is more to being
except physical hunger when it opportunes
the more is what you express
and in some ways diagnose
infinitely
________________________________ From: […]

>In a message dated 1/22/2010 2:18:51 PM Eastern Standard Time,
>allen.scult@drake.edu writes:
>
>>In a message dated 1/21/2010 6:38:55 PM Eastern Standard Time,
>>allen.scult@drake.edu writes:
>>
>> >says Allen (I think) very recently:
>>>
>>>> Hi Bernard,
>>>>
>>>> The crucial matter here is how you take Heidegger’s notion of
>>>>possibility.
>>>> For Heidegger, Dasein IS possibility; that is, […]

In a message dated 1/22/2010 2:18:51 PM Eastern Standard Time,
allen.scult at drake.edu writes:
In a message dated 1/21/2010 6:38:55 PM Eastern Standard Time,
allen.scult at drake.edu writes:
>says Allen (I think) very recently:
>
>> Hi Bernard,
>>
>> The crucial matter here is how you take Heidegger’s notion of
possibility.
>> For Heidegger, Dasein IS possibility; that is, possibility […]

>In a message dated 1/21/2010 6:38:55 PM Eastern Standard Time,
>allen.scult@drake.edu writes:
>
> >says Allen (I think) very recently:
>>
>>> Hi Bernard,
>>>
>>> The crucial matter here is how you take Heidegger’s notion of possibility.
>>> For Heidegger, Dasein IS possibility; that is, possibility is
>>>the very being
>>of Dasein. As such […]

In a message dated 1/21/2010 6:38:55 PM Eastern Standard Time,
allen.scult at drake.edu writes:
>says Allen (I think) very recently:
>
>> Hi Bernard,
>>
>> The crucial matter here is how you take Heidegger’s notion of
possibility.
>> For Heidegger, Dasein IS possibility; that is, possibility is the very
being
>of Dasein. As such Dasein’s being is always […]

>says Allen (I think) very recently:
>
>> Hi Bernard,
>>
>> The crucial matter here is how you take Heidegger’s notion of possibility.
>> For Heidegger, Dasein IS possibility; that is, possibility is the very being
>of Dasein. As such Dasein’s being is always yet to be accomplished. At
>the same time, it is […]

In a message dated 1/20/2010 11:16:38 PM Eastern Standard Time,
allen.scult at drake.edu writes:
In a message dated 1/18/2010 5:02:52 PM Eastern Standard Time,
allen.scult at drake.edu writes:
> > Hi Bernard,
>>
>> but is Jung’s observation “But the mirror lies behind the mask and
>> shows the true face.” correct?
>> Can a person see his “true […]