Heidegger

JOHN YOU’RE USE OF UPACARA EMBODIES ILLUMINATION.
On Fri, Feb 26, 2010 at 1:30 AM, john foster wrote:
> No time is only one dimension….there is also ’spatiality’
>
> temporality has interesting and intuitive meanings: seasons,
> nocturnal/diurnal, emotive, suggestive/poetic, and a range of other
> meanings, even so much as to say that what is temporal…has […]

No time is only one dimension….there is also ’spatiality’
temporality has interesting and intuitive meanings: seasons, nocturnal/diurnal, emotive, suggestive/poetic, and a range of other meanings, even so much as to say that what is temporal…has tempo or it simply denotes passage and succession
________________________________ From: joseph orlando To: Discussions pertaining to the philosophy of […]

BITTUL HA-YESH
On Mon, Feb 22, 2010 at 4:30 AM, john foster wrote:
> okidoki i will check it outskiis darling
>
>
> ——————————
> *From:* joseph orlando
> *To:* Discussions pertaining to the philosophy of Martin Heidegger heidegger at an-archos.com>
> *Sent:* Mon, February 22, 2010 1:12:19 AM
> *Subject:* Re: being = time
>
> KSHERKNARA
>
> On Mon, […]

okidoki i will check it outskiis darling
________________________________ From: joseph orlando To: Discussions pertaining to the philosophy of Martin Heidegger Sent: Mon, February 22, 2010 1:12:19 AM Subject: Re: being = time
KSHERKNARA
On Mon, Feb 22, 2010 at 3:59 AM, john foster wrote:
VE ENSIS DIE SHCHOLANDEDR > >http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=x5E36mdHE3w > >ein hitler […]

KSHERKNARA
On Mon, Feb 22, 2010 at 3:59 AM, john foster wrote:
> VE ENSIS DIE SHCHOLANDEDR
>
> http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=x5E36mdHE…
>
> ein hitler
>
>
> ——————————
> *From:* joseph orlando
> *To:* Discussions pertaining to the philosophy of Martin Heidegger heidegger at an-archos.com>
> *Sent:* Sun, February 21, 2010 10:15:35 PM
> *Subject:* Re: being = time
>
> CONTRAST MAX SCHELER
>
> On Sun, […]

VE ENSIS DIE SHCHOLANDEDR
 http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=x5E36mdHE…
ein hitler
________________________________
From: joseph orlando
To: Discussions pertaining to the philosophy of Martin Heidegger
Sent: Sun, February 21, 2010 10:15:35 PM
Subject: Re: being = time
CONTRAST MAX SCHELER
On Sun, Feb 21, 2010 at 10:00 PM, wrote:
In a message dated 2/21/2010 8:59:56 PM Eastern Standard Time, silicaceous at yahoo.com writes:
>Rubbish saith orlando
>>
>>is the […]

CONTRAST MAX SCHELER
On Sun, Feb 21, 2010 at 10:00 PM, wrote:
> In a message dated 2/21/2010 8:59:56 PM Eastern Standard Time,
> silicaceous at yahoo.com writes:
>
> Rubbish saith orlando
>
> is the appropium of time
> and time takes time to become time
> as you may already know
>
> time is a linear sere
> at […]

soma is contrasted with sema
for now
________________________________
From: joseph orlando
To: Discussions pertaining to the philosophy of Martin Heidegger
Sent: Sun, February 21, 2010 7:02:11 PM
Subject: Re: being = time
SOMA
On Sun, Feb 21, 2010 at 8:59 PM, john foster wrote:
Rubbish saith orlando
>
>is the appropium of time
>
>and time takes time to become time
>as you may already know
>
>time is […]

proto-preception /appropriation
which accords ‘in-definately’
in the harmonium of emimen and other ice sluts
________________________________ From: “Bernx@aol.com” To: heidegger at an-archos.com Sent: Sun, February 21, 2010 10:00:01 PM Subject: Re: being = time
In a message dated 2/21/2010 8:59:56 PM Eastern Standard Time, silicaceous at yahoo.com writes: Rubbish saith orlando > >is the appropium […]

SOMA
On Sun, Feb 21, 2010 at 8:59 PM, john foster wrote:
> Rubbish saith orlando
>
> is the appropium of time
> and time takes time to become time
> as you may already know
>
> time is a linear sere
> at least abstractly
>
> but for now time has at least one content
> for memory
>
> however there […]