Heidegger

In a message dated 2/6/2010 12:24:40 PM Eastern Standard Time,
jpolanik at nc.rr.com writes:
For Those with an Interest in Axiomatic Systems
in view of Heidegger’s well-known failure to comprehend ‘is’ despite
recognizing that is doesn’t always speak in the same voice and despite
enjoining dasein to self-reference in the first person with ‘I am’, I
would like your feedback […]

For Those with an Interest in Axiomatic Systems
in view of Heidegger’s well-known failure to comprehend ‘is’ despite
recognizing that is doesn’t always speak in the same voice and despite
enjoining dasein to self-reference in the first person with ‘I am’, I
would like your feedback concerning the proposition:
(E P)(x: x !

—–Original Message—–
From: john foster
To: Discussions pertaining to the philosophy of Martin Heidegger
Sent: Tue, Feb 2, 2010 10:10 pm
Subject: Re: Are corporations people ?
That is partly correct. However, Corporations cannot be tried for ‘crimes’ perpetrated on ‘citizens’, only citizens can be charged and tried for crimes. There is no criminal code in the USA which […]

In a message dated 2/5/2010 5:29:59 PM Eastern Standard Time,
tgeorgescu at home.nl writes:
> I get your drift in the comparision of the U.S. and Hitler. Your drift,
> however, is on very thin ice. Good luck.
> Bernard
War crimes are war crimes regardless of the ideology they serve.
 http://www.chomsky.info/talks/1990—-.h…
Greetings,
Tudor
Yes, but only an ideology may determine what […]

> I get your drift in the comparision of the U.S. and Hitler. Your drift,
> however, is on very thin ice. Good luck.
> Bernard
War crimes are war crimes regardless of the ideology they serve.
 http://www.chomsky.info/talks/1990—-.h…
Greetings,
Tudor

In a message dated 2/2/2010 11:10:48 PM Eastern Standard Time,
silicaceous at yahoo.com writes:
[snip]:George Bush will never be charged, tried and convicted for his
authorization of the use of uranium bombs in Iraq; simply because Iraqi courts
have no jurisdiction in the US. However if the US was a tiny weeny little
backward Republic, and George “Saddam” Bush the […]

That is partly correct. However, Corporations cannot be tried for ‘crimes’ perpetrated on ‘citizens’, only citizens can be charged and tried for crimes. There is no criminal code in the USA which allows Corporations to be charged and tried for crimes. Thus there is no criminal penalty for being a Corporation, when […]

In a message dated 2/2/2010 2:03:31 PM Eastern Standard Time,
janstr at wirehub.nl writes:
Dear All,
I recently heard the US Supreme Court has decided that corporations are
people,
i.a. implying entitlement to First Amendment rights and protection.
I was wondering on what philosophical grounds this decision was
based. At first
thought it seems to me a grotesque fallacy to equate people […]

i can only explain american corporation law in terms of american law. not much of a piece of reasoning. but i have been a practicing
lawyer for 42 years and here is the factual and legal premise. do with it what you will.
the creation of a business corporation has its roots in mercantilism. […]

The Supreme Court ruled corporations are legally people in the 19th century: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Santa_Clara_County_v._Southern_Pacific_Railroad
My understanding is that a corporation is just that, treating a business as a body (person) for legal purposes. The recent ruling was a nuance in interpretation.
—– Original Message —-
From: Jan Straathof
To: Discussions pertaining to the philosophy of Martin Heidegger
Sent: Tue, February 2, 2010 9:26:41 AM
Subject: […]