6X POLANIK CLIPS OUT ARGUMENT!
May 11th, 2008, search relatedRelated posts :: 6X POLANIK CLIPS OUT ARGUMENT! :: 6X POLANIK CLIPS OUT ARGUMENT! :: 5X Polanik clips out argument :: 6X POLANIK CLIPS OUT ARGUMENT!
Hey Malcolm , what is the difference between a doood and a bloke, errr,
since this is a Heidegger list, …what is the difference between being
a dooood and being a bloke?
Bob aChillin’ on this fine sunday in sunny SoCal ….
—————————-
On Sun, May 4, 2008 at 9:31 AM, Malcolm Riddoch wrote:
On 04/05/2008, at 9:55 PM, Anthony Crifasi wrote:
Googlers note: This is the 6TH TIME in a row (!!!!!!) that Polanik has
clipped out the argument that I expressly requested that he address:
You’ll probably need to actually engage with and articulate your own
interpretation of Hume in order to get people to address arguments that
you don’t argue Anthony. You can’t just cite a url to someone else’s
argument and pretend you’ve engaged in argumentation then flame people
for not engaging with the argument you don’t argue… chill out dood!
mr
——————————
