A Being is Not Necessarily an Existent
January 25th, 2008, search relatedRelated posts :: A Being is Not Necessarily an Existent :: A Being is Not Necessarily an Existent :: A Being is Not Necessarily an Existent :: A Being is Not Necessarily an Existent
That Pete wrote:
>Joseph Polanik wrote:
>>do you really think that Heidegger and Plato are asking the same
>>question concerning the structure of the human individual?
>My answer is no.
well, then, does it not follow that there is a place where the road
forks — a point where one path leads to asking the question that
Heidegger asks while the other path leads to asking the question that
Plato asks?
if so, would you not also agree that one might wisely choose to describe
the ground he stands upon before choosing a path by which to proceed
from there?
Joe
–
Philosophy is, after all, done ultimately in the first person for the
first person. — H-N Castaneda
@^@~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~@^@
http://what-am-i.net
@^@~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~@^@
