[Admin] And we have a winner!
May 22nd, 2006, search relatedRelated posts :: [Admin] And we have a winner! :: [Admin] And we have a winner! :: [Admin] And we have a winner! :: Anti-American M.O.
In article , Dr
Malcolm Riddoch writes
>
>On 22/05/2006, at 9:32 AM, Tympan Segment wrote:
>
>> I have an observation and a question. I checked how the new site
>> looks in my browser and it looks pretty messy to me. The quoting
>> gets all messed up with spaces in every other line sometimes. Is
>> this my browser? What is causing the quoting in a response to get
>> all messed up? A post only looks good if a person doesn’t quote a
>> previous post or it’s not included.
>
>Yeh, if you use html or rich Text in your email the results aren’t
>too bad, but a lot of the plain text posts have their paragraphs
>collapsed and quoting jumbled.
You could try a very simple conversion of plain test into HTML by
placing
at the start of the text and
at the end.
> I’m still working on the layout but
>with so many different email formats it may take some time to bed
>down. If you can enable html posts then I’d say go for it. You can
>continue to freely post to the list but you can also now register and
>post directly to the blog if you so wish. Registration is at:
>
>http://heidegger.an-archos.com/wp-register.php
>
>> My other question is whether or not the site now is going to be
>> available regardless of your contract with your university? Can it
>> be said to be a stable domain/list then?
>
>The an-archos site is part of my online business whereas the list is
>still hosted on the university server. I’ll be moving the list over
>to the an-archos server as soon as necessary but not before so yes,
>in that sense the list will continue as is with me moderating it.
Will it have the option of being accessed as mailing list?
> The
>only difficulty is how I pay for server costs which at the moment
>will most probably be via Google ads in the web site footer. If
>anyone has or wants to add a CafePress shop or shops they can talk to
>me about it.
>
>Hmmmm …. maybe I should start a new thread on the Monetization of
>Being: Potentiality and Actuality?
>
I suspect that any return from Google ads will be very low.
–
Philip Baker
