Argument Against …
October 12th, 2008, search relatedRelated posts :: 6X POLANIK CLIPS OUT ARGUMENT! :: 6X CRIFASI MAKES NO ARGUMENT! :: 6X POLANIK CLIPS OUT ARGUMENT! :: 2X Anthony makes no argument
In a message dated 10/11/2008 10:39:44 AM Eastern Daylight Time,
GEVANS613 at aol.com writes:
To an eliminativist materialist everything that exists, exists as some form
of a specific conglomerate of ever-changing matergy. Therefore, for me
EVERYTHING in the cosmos and beyond (into what folk call *infinity) is comprised of
matergy. There are no *matergically unoccupied spaces.*
Are you thereby refuting a concept of entropy and the second law of
thermodynamics? Do you equally include your matergy as a property of dark matter and
antimatter or for (sic) that matter the matter of a black hole? In all you
apparently preclude the notion of “unoccupied space” including the ontological
state of Death. Then, of course, you must embrace the crowded matergy of an
afterlife and its bi-polar reality of Heaven and Hell. E’ vero?
Bernard
**************New MapQuest Local shows what’s happening at your destination.
Dining, Movies, Events, News & more. Try it out
http://local.mapquest.com/?ncid=emlcntne…)
