Argument Against Ignorance
October 12th, 2008, search relatedRelated posts :: Argument Against Ignorance :: CPI und OD :: On the Alleged Impossibility of Claims of Partial Ignorance :: The unStated Case for ‘All that is, is Matergy’
In my last post I mangled the citation. I was quoting Kant:
Joseph Polanik wrote:
> I’m planning another post to address your complete agreement with and/or
> misunderstanding of what Kant said about ‘exists’ as a predicate;
> meanwhile, let’s consider some of his remarks that are more to the
> point:
>
> “I am conscious of myself, neither as I appear to myself, nor as I am by
> myself, but only that I am. … this shows that I have no knowledge of
> myself as I am, but only as I appear to myself. The consciousness of
> oneself is therefore very far from being a knowledge of oneself…”
> [Muller 92-93; B: 156-160]
The citation should read: Kant, Critique of Pure Reason. Muller
translation p. 92-93; B: 156-160]
Sorry for the confusion.
Joe
–
Philosophy is, after all, done ultimately in the first person for the
first person. — H-N Castaneda
@^@~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~@^@
http://what-am-i.net
@^@~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~@^@
