Aristotle on suicide [was Heidegger Email List?]
July 31st, 2006, search relatedRelated posts :: Aristotle on suicide [was Heidegger Email List?] :: Aristotle on suicide [was Heidegger Email List?] :: Aristotle on suicide [was Heidegger Email List?] :: Aristotle on suicide [was Heidegger Email List?]
>From: Kenneth Johnson
>Date: 2006/07/31 Mon AM 11:45:40 CDT
>To:
Discussions pertaining to the philosophy of Martin Heidegger
>Subject: Re: Aristotle on suicide [was Heidegger Email List?]
>
>
>>
>>Man cannot become god, Bob.
>>
>>Abdassamad
>
>Hello Abdassamad, that seems to be only an opinion, how would you know if a
>man can’t become a god, maybe you have inside information on the matter?
>
>there are other doctrines extant that say otherwise, the mormons for
>example, or least I think they believe they can become a god, tho its been
>a long long time since I rememoried this subject in their doctrines.
>
>Maybe Kevin knows
>
>
>just being testy
>
>Kenneth
from Alan Watts’ _The Way of Zen_ [ISBN 0-679-72301-3; Copyright
1957]
(p32ff — The Origins of Buddhism)
[…]
Fundamental to the life and thought of India from the very earliest
times is the great mythological theme of atma-yajna-the act of “self-
sacrifice” whereby God gives birth to the world, and whereby men,
following the divine pattern, reintegrate themselves with God. The
act by which the world is created is the same act by which it is
consummated-the giving up of one’s life-as if the whole process of
the universe were the type of game in which it is necessary to pass
on the ball as soon as it is received. Thus the basic myth of
Hinduism is that the world is God playing hide-and-seek with himself.
As Prajapati, Vishnu, or Brahma, the Lord under many names creates
the world by an act of self-dismemberment or self-forgetting, whereby
the One becomes Many, and the single Actor plays innumerable parts.
In the end, he comes again to himself only to begin the play once
more-the One dying into the Many, and the Many dying into the One.
A thousand heads hath Purusha, a thousand eyes, a thousand feet. On
every side pervading earth he fills a space ten fingers wide.
This Purusha is all that yet hath been and all that is to be; The
lord of immortality that waxes greater still by food.
So mighty is his greatness; yea, greater than this is Purusha. All
creatures are one fourth of him, three-fourths eternal life in
heaven…
When the gods prepared the sacrifice with Purusha as their offering,
Its oil was spring, the holy gift was autumn; summer was the wood.
>From that great general sacrifice the dripping fat was gathered up.
He formed the creatures of the air, and animals both wild and
tame….
When they divided Purusha, how many portions did they make? What do
they call his mouth, his arms? What do they call his thighs and feet?
The Brahman (caste) was his mouth, of both his arms was the Rajanya
(Kshatriya caste) made. His thighs became Vaishya, from his feet the
Shudra was produced.
The moon was gendered from his mind, and from his eye the sun had
birth; Indra and Agni from his mouth were born, and Vayu from his
breath.
Forth from his navel came mid-air; the sky was fashioned from his
head; Earth from his feet, and from his ear the regions. Thus they
formed the worlds.
The thousand heads, eyes, and feet of the Purasha are the members of
men and other beings, for the point is that That which knows in and
through every individual is God himself, the atman or Self of the
world. Every life is a part or role in which the mind of God is
absorbed, somewhat as an actor absorbs himself in being Hamlet and
forgets that in real life he is Mr. Smith. By the act of self-
abandonment God becomes all beings, yet at the same time does not
cease to be God. “All creatures are one fourth of him, three-fourths
eternal life in heaven.” For God is divided in play, in make-believe, but remains undivided in reality. So that when the play comes to an end, the individualized consciousness awakes to find itself divine.
In the beginning this world was Atman (the Self), alone in the form
of Purusha. Looking about he saw nothing other than himself.
He said first, “I am.” Thence came the word “I.” Thus even now, when
one is spoken to, he first answers simply, “It is I,” and then tells
whatever name he has.
On all sides That has hands and feet;
On all sides eyes, heads, and faces;
On all sides in the world it hears;
All things it embraces.
It is important to remember that this picture of the world as the
play (lila) of God is mythological in form. If, at this stage, we
were to translate it directly into philosophical statement it would
be a crude type of pantheism, with which Hindu philosophy is
generally and erroneously confused. Thus the idea of each man, each
thing, as a part which the Purusha plays in the state of self-
forgetting must not be confused with a logical or scientific
statement of fact. The form of statement is poetic, not logical. In
the words of the Mundaka Upanishad,
Truly this atman (Self)-the poets say-travels on this earth from body to body. […]
>
>_______________________________________________
>heidegger mailing list
>heidegger@soca.ecu.edu.au
>http://www.soca.ecu.edu.au/mailman/listinfo/heidegger
>http://heidegger.an-archos.com/
