*Being* and *Nothing* as Paradigmatic Heterons
April 2nd, 2008, search relatedRelated posts :: Broken Tools :: Broken Tools :: Is There No Definition of ‘Holeron’ but there is of *Heteron.* :: Broken Tools
*Being* and *Nothing* as Paradigmatic Heterons.
Whilst the conceptualisation of *Being* is an illegitimate heteron or
wrongful ideational mirror image of the Greek instantiation to mae on
(that which is not) it is also the case that both *Being* and *Nothing.*
as twinned concepts are particular modes of the human neurological system
when it selects the words as mirrored nominals bereft of any denotatum.
It is an attempt to convey the idea of the presence or absence of some
unspecified entity or entities. The cognitive speculums Being* and *Nothing.*
are ALWAYS used as non-existent others, conceptual counterparts (heterons)
for purposes of differentiating occupied rather than unoccupied space.
The problem is the assumption that the very process of employing these
ontological devices neurologically instantiates them by the very fact that they
appear to be the wrong-way-round mirrored opposites of each other.
As such is the case, no predication is possible in the case of the words
*Being* and *Nothing.*
Any predication thought to be attributed to the words does not add to or
provide any information about the concepts, because neither exist to be
describe. Attempts to predicatively describe *Being* and *Nothing.*, even the
valiant attempts of MichaelP merely adds to what can be said about the existential
modality and neurological processes of he or she who thinks about and utters
the concept *Being* and *Nothing.*
