Heidegger

on 27/6/06 9:56 PM, Bakker, R.B.M. de at R.B.M.deBakker at uva.nl wrote:

>
>
> —–Oorspronkelijk bericht—–
> Van: heidegger-bounces at soca.ecu.edu.au
> [mailto:heidegger-bounces@soca.ecu.edu.au]Namens peter k
> Verzonden: dinsdag 27 juni 2006 15:32
> Aan: Discussions pertaining to the philosophy of Martin Heidegger
> Onderwerp: Re: Broken Tools
>
>
> on 26/6/06 5:23 PM, Bakker, R.B.M. de at R.B.M.deBakker at uva.nl wrote:
>
>>
>>
>> —–Oorspronkelijk bericht—–
>> Van: heidegger-bounces at soca.ecu.edu.au
>> [mailto:heidegger-bounces@soca.ecu.edu.au]Namens That Pete
>> Verzonden: zaterdag 24 juni 2006 19:21
>> Aan: Discussions pertaining to the philosophy of Martin Heidegger
>> Onderwerp: Re: Broken Tools
>>
>>
>> — allen scult wrote:
>>> You might have noticed that some of the boys have
>>> been bad-mouthing religion, once again
>>> cataloguing the ridiculous and terrible things
>>> people do with it, as if that had something to do
>>> with it.
>>
>> I wouldn’t conflate ridiculing people’s religious
>> pronouncements about hens and red cows with denigrating
>> divinity, theology, or piety. As Heidegger says, the
>> Greeks’ relationship to the divine is not like the
>> Romans’ religio.
>>
>>
>> either this remains a communication without consequence,
>> or one adds sthing as to how the immurement of aletheia by
>> Roman imperialism can be lifted.
>>
>> You are all doing the same, Allan, Bob, Tympan: stating
>> words by others, and keeping them so in the postmodern realm,
>> so that meaninglessness, monotheism, Jahweh, Jesus, money, all
>> the same, go on dominating unhindered. At the bottom of this
>> practice is sheer malice, and it shows ever more clearly.
>> All impotence falls prey to it.
>>
>> That Hegel, Heidegger and others are used for nihilist purposes,
>> belongs to nihilism itself. Therefore the destruction of Heidegger
>> is an essential sign. It shows very clearly in his being quoted.
>>
>> rene
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> heidegger mailing list
>> heidegger at soca.ecu.edu.au
>> http://www.soca.ecu.edu.au/mailman/listi…
>> http://heidegger.an-archos.com/
>
> it is not mere malice. The impending death of myself, my family friends and
> lovers is a tragedy, and a certain tragedy, all of us will be gone from here
> in the blink of an eye, and “the window will be closed for us” as Malcom
> once said to me. I hate the lie, the sick predators whom prey on the
> fragility of the human condition. One of my friends has liver cancer, bone
> cancer- she has two children under seven, and a third only ten. I would
> dearly like to launch a radical ’secular’ crusade against organized religion
> and the collection of evil ‘rockspiders’ who drive its cause. John the
> Baptist said that when the massire comes, he will coming bearing an axe,
> which he will wield without mercy - well I’ve got a machine gun, so he’d
> bloody well better not come anywhere near me. pk
>
>
> Sure Peter, who is not right nowadays?
> Heidegger’s assessment though is that not only organized religion but *any*
> organization has the cancer of nihilism inside. And if we would look closer,
> it would appear not even to be a cancer. So that there can be no cure and no
> leader curers. We cannot just cut away what has made us during thousands of
> years. Or do you think what the Republicans did to Spanish priests, or the
> Russians to religious children etc etc, is liberating? It merely softens
> the cancer of widerwille temporarily.
>
> See my next post on how religion became ensnared into ontotheology, that is:
> metaphysics, and the fatal conequences this entailed, the moment metaphysics
> was
> completed and blown away like dust. Metaphysica melaina! That throws a
> different
> light on Heraclitus..
>
> regards
> rene
>
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> heidegger mailing list
> heidegger at soca.ecu.edu.au
> http://www.soca.ecu.edu.au/mailman/listi…
> http://heidegger.an-archos.com/
besides rene , why arent your posts subject to the same nihlism, text is
nothing if not organnization, the phenomenological ‘pureland’ that you
heideggerrians subscribe as a aprior is bollocks! It could be minutley taken
apart by a talented post-structuralist thinker (at the risk of catching JUDS
disease). pk

Posted on Wednesday, June 28th, 2006 at 7:00 pm
comment | rss 2.0 | trackback