Crapaxioms and Self-Predicational Platonic Puffballs
November 24th, 2007, search relatedRelated posts :: Joseph Polanik the continuing game player :: Do You Claim the Power? :: Do You Claim the Power? :: Do You Claim the Power?
Slippery Sam aka Dr. Fallacia writes:
What of a saying that does not predicate a predicate of a subject?
A pure, thoughtful saying that sees the originary phenomenon?
Jud:
All such sayings are simply antecedently expressed notions already armed
and primed with covert predication, where the ontological implicature is
already understood and the predicational acceptances already in place
betwixt addressor and addressee in the language or dialogue concerned.
Anyway, as Vlastos pointed out, many of the so-called forms of Plato are
self-predicational.
Of course the pederast Plato seemed to be unaware of it, for in the
Protagoras [ 330 c–d] he had his dummy-puppet Socrates say:
*Justice is just and Holiness is holy*
and
*What other thing could be holy - if holiness isn’t holy ?* he asks.
Is it possible that anyone should say that *Justice is just* and yet not
realise that this is just as good as saying that a Form that IS that character
HAS
that character? Vlastos.
So is the trannie obsessional juvenilia: *Being* self-predicational too?
Well yes - it must be, for: *Being* maps to that which is being a…insert
name of any being here. In the sense that *That which is* is rooted in the
self-predication Platonic plaything *Being* then it has its own
predicational-root rooty-toot-tooted up its ass in a typically crackpot Heideggerian manner.
* Likewise God’s: *I am,* for just as the unstated modalities omitted by
God to Moses are too manifold to reel off, and as Moses the believer and
the waiting Children of Israel below (or their priests) were expected to be
aware of many of God’s existential modalities anyway, so too the
predicational concretisations of *being* are infinite and therefore cannot be stated
[hence the need for this spurious universal comforter to be stuck in the gobs of
the unknowing ones in the first place.]
Regards,
Jud
Personal Website:
_http://evans-experientialism.freewebspace.com/index.htm_
http://evans-experientialism.freewebspac…)
The infinity of parts in the organized bodies of plants and animals
have too great a complexity and functional interdependence to be able
to arise from chaos.
Malebranche.
