Heidegger

—–Oorspronkelijk bericht—–
Van: heidegger-bounces at soca.ecu.edu.au [mailto:heidegger-bounces@soca.ecu.edu.au]Namens GEVANS613 at aol.com
Verzonden: maandag 7 augustus 2006 13:48
Aan: heidegger at soca.ecu.edu.au
Onderwerp: Der Boykott Kameradschaftlichen Seins

Jud:
The unremitting, never-ending shrieking, clamour, ad hominem and Der Boykott Kameradschaftlichen Seins about politics and Jews from the left and the right [but mostly right] only reinforces the self-evident [a point that only ein politischer Narr would not spot after a week or two] that the basic ground of the Heidegger cult is not about philosophy - it is really about politics and Jews.

My contributions over the years have usually been concerned with ontology and to point to the lack of anything seriously *philosophical* in: *Heidegger der Nicht-Fragesteller,* and have included attempts to rip away the mask behind which le plus grand poseur politique du monde hid the very evil seeds of racial hatred which inspires and gives oxygen to the very ad hominem that afflicts us now. Now even I, who have never been one to turn the other cheek, and always return like with like, must admit that the levels of unremitting Heidegger-inspired ad hominem twixt the politicos here have reached levels of abuse I have rarely witnessed on other lists.

Admittedly my eliminative determinism is an ontology for which few on this list have any sympathy - but at least it is unified ontology, and often provokes lively philosophical discussion, and is not a boringly incessant raking and re-raking over the coals of the failure of Western middle eastern foreign policy and Real Politik.

Why not split the list in two completely - and form a new list called *The Politics of Martin Heidegger List? * Such a list would cater for those more interested in the political ramifications of the man and the implications of his racialism, and would provide a podium for the more serious academic analyses of the Middle East, like that just posted by Malcolm, or ones concerning Germany and the West by the Dark Stranger? Is it not true to say that there is too much *bleeding over* of the political or the polemos [which as far as I can see has nothing whatsoever to do with philosophy [or Heidegger] into the space were others who are actually interested in philosophy and ontology can discuss away to their heart’s content?

BTW. As far as the two graphs were concerned - it is not educational in the sphere of the study of dead-ideas, to compare and contrast the different continuing interest-levels in the various areas of the world in Hitler and his most ardent academic follower and fellow Nazi?

this was the shit you were supposed to get rid of, but you erase yourself by sticking to it. That’s what you have made of freedom: slander.
So what, you would say? well, there is no way to hide, as you prove now already for such long time. Ever more clear it appears that on all
levels things are falling down, but you think you have the freedom to make your ridiculous and vile accusations - which your utterances
are by themselves, apart from a possible development. But there is being, and there is a tone, and your utterances too reverberate in a
sphere, and the (dis)harmony of that is what you cannot hide. It is

never too late though,

rene

the real nazi’s are the anti-nazi’s, they need nazi’s in order to be.

this is clear now, and those sticking to it, dead.

regards,

Jud Evans.
Personal Website: http://evans-experientialism.freewebspac…

Posted on Monday, August 7th, 2006 at 12:25 pm
comment | rss 2.0 | trackback