Heidegger

In a message dated 31/12/2006 22:50:06 GMT Standard Time,
michael at sandwich-de-sign.co.uk writes:

> Dear all,
>
> Marie Mainil here. Let’s all calm down, there is a simple explanation to
> what happened. Allen is out of town for a few days, and is having
> difficulties with his email account. As such, he used one of my email
> accounts to post on the list, which I had no problems with. One of us
should
> have given this explanation along with the post. It seems to me that
> apologies would be well given multi- directionally, after all, all involved
> failed a certain level of courtesy in the matter at end, from omitting a
> piece of information that would have saved some confusion to distasteful
> accusations and lack of openness to possibilities. En passant, at the end
of
> the day, I am most pleased I let Allen post through my account, I
personally
> think his post was tasteful and affectionate towards Jud, as always,
> entertaining and possibly enlightening to us bystanders.
>
> Best wishes,
>
> *Marie Mainil*

Marie, Allen, Jud, … I must apologise for the silliness I unleashed; the
post really didn’t sound at all like Allen to me, but… Back to Heidegger.

regards and happy new year to all

mP

Jud:
Thanks Michael - *All’s well that ends well* as the good bard said.

Please all accept my contribution to the mult-directional apology fest too.
Sorry if I was a bit hard on you Nunc - you know how sensitive us Celts are -
its nothing to do with *pyschology* it come with the tartan/green-genes

All the best for 2007 to all!

Jud.

Posted on Sunday, December 31st, 2006 at 11:00 pm
comment | rss 2.0 | trackback