Heidegger

On 03/06/2006, at 3:23 PM, Anthony Crifasi wrote:

> My prediction for Malcolm’s next reply: “And the point is … what
> exactly?”

As I stated prevously, you are welcome to join in the discussion
anytime you feel up to it. The thread starts here:

 http://heidegger.an-archos.com/archive/e…

Cheney’s reasoning for oil Lebensraum is here:

 http://heidegger.an-archos.com/archive/e…

And if you would like to honour your previous undertaking to engage
with the earlier question concerning terror you’ll find that here:

 http://www.soca.ecu.edu.au/pipermail/hei…

Since your entire engagement however revolves around endlessly
deflecting any discussion then also please feel free to continue
working out your protocols of neutrality for this list which seem to
mostly involve not discussing anything to do with either Israeli or
US violence. I can understand your inability to broach these problems
but you are starting to sound a bit crazy Anthony. Your idea of
neutrality is not only blatantly one-sided but these are school yard
antics.

If anyone else on list or on the site would care to discuss the
problem of “terror”, pro or contra, please feel free to join in.

Regards,

Malcolm

***************************
Dr Malcolm Riddoch
Electronic Arts
School of Communications and Contemporary Arts
Faculty of Communications and Creative Industries
Edith Cowan University, 2 Bradford St, Mount Lawley
Perth Western Australia
+61 08 9370 6034

Posted on Saturday, June 3rd, 2006 at 9:15 am
comment | rss 2.0 | trackback
Tags: lebensraum» morality» terror»