Heidegger

—– Original Message —–
From: “Malcolm Riddoch”

> On 03/06/2006, at 3:23 PM, Anthony Crifasi wrote:
>
>> My prediction for Malcolm’s next reply: “And the point is … what
>> exactly?”
>
> As I stated prevously, you are welcome to join in the discussion
> anytime you feel up to it. The thread starts here:
>
> http://heidegger.an-archos.com/archive/e…
>
> Cheney’s reasoning for oil Lebensraum is here:
>
> http://heidegger.an-archos.com/archive/e…
> oil-4
>
> And if you would like to honour your previous undertaking to engage
> with the earlier question concerning terror you’ll find that here:
>
> http://www.soca.ecu.edu.au/pipermail/hei…
>
> Since your entire engagement however revolves around endlessly
> deflecting any discussion then also please feel free to continue
> working out your protocols of neutrality for this list which seem to
> mostly involve not discussing anything to do with either Israeli or
> US violence.

You may find the refutation of that claim here:
 http://www.soca.ecu.edu.au/pipermail/hei…
 http://www.soca.ecu.edu.au/pipermail/hei…
 http://www.soca.ecu.edu.au/pipermail/hei…

> I can understand your inability to broach these problems
> but you are starting to sound a bit crazy Anthony. Your idea of
> neutrality is not only blatantly one-sided but these are school yard
> antics.

A history of Malcolm’s “neutral” stating of questions can be found here:
 http://www.soca.ecu.edu.au/pipermail/hei…

Posted on Saturday, June 3rd, 2006 at 2:20 pm
comment | rss 2.0 | trackback
Tags: polemos»