Etwas Raetselhaftes — Somewhat perplexing
September 11th, 2007, search relatedRelated posts :: Etwas Raetselhaftes — Somewhat perplexing :: Etwas Raetselhaftes — Somewhat perplexing :: Etwas Raetselhaftes — Somewhat perplexing :: Etwas Raetselhaftes — Somewhat perplexing
In a message dated 11/09/2007 02:03:43 GMT Standard Time, Bernx at aol.com
writes:
In a message dated 9/10/2007 8:21:21 PM Eastern Daylight Time,
GEVANS613 at aol.com writes:
Bernard:
It gives notice, however, that at the micro level of phenomena the macro
level of understanding, to which you appear to be limited, avoids the
uncertainty of existence.
Jud:
There IS NO ontological difference - the kooky *existence* does not exist -
only the objects exist - not *Their existence.*
Ah, dear Jud, your certainty is clearly wrought in over-compensated doubt.
Would that leave you as an object among objects and your only claim that you
exist? Peccato!
Bernard
Jud:
Yes Bernard, you likable rogue - like you I am only an object amongst other
objects. As to the need for a *claim* that I exist, there is no need for
that. The confused Descartes might have needed such reassurance, [being the
attenuated product of a theological factory farm) but not I. [or *me* depending
upon your grammatical appetite.]
Regards,
Jud
Personal Website: http://evans-experientialism.freewebspac…
“In nuclear war all men are cremated equal.”
Dexter Gordon
