Heidegger

In a message dated 05/10/2007 05:20:49 GMT Standard Time, Bernx at aol.com
writes:

In a message dated 10/4/2007 7:31:11 PM Eastern Daylight Time,
GEVANS613 at aol.com writes:

Any beginner will tell you that the properties of a being are not DIFFERENT
from it - they make up the compendium of the human descriptions of the
perceivable characteristics of the manner in which the adjectivally described
object exists. They form the Gesamtsumme (the grand total or sum total) of the
humanly perceived features of an object - its colour, size, smell, taste,
weight, mass, etc. as filtered through the human somesthesis - the faculty of
bodily perception; the sensory systems associated with the human body;
including the skin sensors and proprioception and the internal organs if you
ingest some of the material.

Jud, whose or what “sensory systems” are you talking about? That of a
cockroach? Wake up, man, to human being.
Bernard

Jud:
I’m afraid that one can neither wake up nor go to sleep to *human being*
Bernard - it is simply a myth - just like *mind* and other trannie garbage.
Poor old cockroaches and tadpoles don’t have cockroach *beings,* nor a
tadpole *beings* either, they just get on with being cockroaches and tadpoles,
just like man gets on with being human. If you could collect some of your magic
beans - sorry - I mean *beings* and can them, you could make yourself a
fortune in the exotic foods market or the Daseinic Deli? What about planting a
quick growing being bean in one in the flower-bed outside of the Empire
States Building and climbing up it after billing it as: *Dewy-Eyed Jack and the
Being Stalk?*
You could even donate it to the daseins of New York as a patented
*Fabaceaen Exterior Existentialist Emergency Fire Escape?*

Regards,

Jud
Personal Website: http://evans-experientialism.freewebspac…

“In nuclear war all men are cremated equal.”
Dexter Gordon

Posted on Friday, October 5th, 2007 at 12:50 pm
comment | rss 2.0 | trackback