EXPERIENTIO PART TWO
October 1st, 2007, search relatedRelated posts :: Experientio :: Summary of Arguments against the Experientio :: The Forensic Inference within the Experientio :: EXPERIENTIO PART ONE
In a message dated 10/1/2007 5:49:22 PM Eastern Daylight Time,
GEVANS613 at aol.com writes:
‘…one of Plato’s most important discoveries.’ — how otherness enables a
non-being to ‘be’ in a certain way, namely, as the opposite (antithesis) of
something else (e. g. the ugly as the non-being of the beautiful). [8] (Eldred.
heidegger. an-archos.)
Dear Jud Heterophobus:
That is only if you follow the simplistic logic or thesis qua antithesis
without substantiating both as complements rather than bonded in the service of
negation: I not Jud, you not Bernard and by which neither may be assigned as the
non-existent antithesis. If Eldred prefers to follow the logic of the
privatio boni, that is his business.
Sincerely;
Me not Jud or:
where Jud is the abscence of Eldred and Eldred is the abscence of Jud.
************************************** See what’s new at http://www.aol.com
