Faye again [was this medicine has/has not been tested on human animals]
November 30th, 2006, search relatedRelated posts :: this medicine has/has not been tested on human animals :: this medicine has/has not been tested on human animals :: this medicine has/has not been tested on human animals :: this medicine has/has not been tested on human animals
In article , GEVANS613 at aol.com writes
>
>
>In a message dated 30/11/2006 00:01:48 GMT Standard Time, phil at thalasson.com
>writes:
>
>In article , GEVANS613 at aol.com writes
>>Up to now no denials of Faye’s claims have risen to the surface of the
>>Heideggerian duck-pond - not even from the Generalissimo of Apologia
>himself -
>>General Belshazzar Baker [Ehrend Haupt Berater zum Verband von Heideggerian
>
>>Apologeten.]
>
>
>We have been through all this before:
>
>Quelques textes pour répondre à la diffamation
>FRENCH PHILOSOPHERS FIGHT BACK!
>_http://parolesdesjours.free.fr/scandale.htm_
> http://parolesdesjours.free.fr/scandale….)
>
>
>
>Nein mein general we have NOT been through all this before. I have read the
>French stuff you mention all before and found NO EVIDENCE whatsoever that
>counters Faye’s claims. None of the content of the site you mention has EVER
>been addressed on this list to my knowledge - unless it took place during my
>holidays when I always cancel all my mail?
Philippe Arjakovsky points out that Faye is not quoting from an
unpublished lecture but from one that was published several years ago
and nothing remarkable was seen in it at the time. It only becomes so
when Faye quotes out of context.
Arjakovsky:
“There is the question of ‘the radical need to find the enemy’ and ‘to
initiate an attack with a view to their total annihilation’ [quoting
H]
… One sees that the passage cited on the enemy and combat is taken
in reality from a commentary on a fragment of Heraclitus, the
celebrated fragment DK53 which says that ‘polemos is the father of
everything that is’ and the thesis in general of the chapter is that
polemos, combat, is for the Greeks the essential home of all that
is, well beyond all human activity.”
>
>I will start feeding you with the names of anti -Heideggerians [as if I
>hadn’t anything better to do] when YOU provide evidence that Faye’s claims
>about
>Heidegger are false. But beware - it is quite possible that professor Faye
>may be quite litigious [est-ce que vous comprenez ce que je signifie?]
Just give the name of one anti-Heideggerian who does not take Heidegger
seriously. Faye is making a career out of taking Heidegger seriously.
You’ve already promoted the maître de conférence to a professorship!
>
>Mon General;
>BTW I have just had my weekly ‘Verband’ replacement - rather a trek
>since Barnet PCT appears to be somewhat short of district nurses.
>
>Jud:
>They are all tied up servicing retired Heideggerians with hernias or
>hermeneutical herpes.
Really? I see, hide amongst the (unhidden?) enemy, who all presumably
can afford private medicine, in order to elude the Nazi hunters.
> Do you
>hear a distict *twanging* sound and feel sharp pains in your private parts
>as
>if somebody was sticking tiny razor-blades into your scrotum when you
>urinate? That is often the first sign of trouble. This is obviously the root
>of
>your problem.
Wrong diagnosis.
> I am surprised that the PCT did not issue you with one of the
>new advisory leaflets for sufferers of this verbandic condition. Maybe you
>have been given one? If not ring them up and say you want a copy of NHS
>Form
> 32456H: *Remedying Excessive Reaming - A Guide for the Perplexed.* If
>not in stock at Barnet, it is available from any branch of *Her Majesty’s
>Stationary Office.*[price 75p]
>
No need to ring them - as I said, wrong diagnosis.
–
Philip Baker
