Heidegger

GEVANS613 at aol.com wrote:

jPolanik at nc.rr.com writes:

>[Joe]: my use of the even prime number counter-example dates back much
>further than July 2008. see my post of 2007-10-15 to the Heidegger list
>entitled Summary of Arguments against the Experiento. you joined the
>ensuing thread on 2007-10-17.

>Jud: It is unlikely that I would have knowingly stored and retrieved a
>reference you made a year ago, or the more recent one in order to
>incorporate it as part of my attack on logic and number. Had I known it
>was a reference you I had used I would have mentioned your name. I am
>in the habit of recording all references in an application called *The
>Journal * in my *handy refs lists* section. I have now checked *The
>Journal* and I see that the reference to (Lemmon. Copi and Cohen is
>indeed recorded in my journal, but your name is not entered. This is
>probably because I have my own dog-eared (older copy 1967) of Lemmon’s
>book, and assumed that it was a reference of my own and that I must
>have at some time looked up Copi & Cohen on the internet or elsewhere.

>On that basis I have now referenced your reference of the Lemmon, Copi
>& Cohen reference to you. I must apologise for this omission, which was
>neither deliberate, nor meant to be discourteous. I am remarkably old
>fashioned in that area, but it was simply down to the huge amount of
>correspondence and the refs that it generates and I deal with on a large
>number of lists. You can check out the amended reference here:
>http://evans-experientialism.freewebspace.com/reification_of_the_unreal.htm

Thank you, Jud.

you are being very gracious about this; and, I appreciate the
opportunity to contribute to your extensive website.

Joe

–
Philosophy is, after all, done ultimately in the first person for the
first person. — H-N Castaneda

@^@~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~@^@
 http://what-am-i.net
@^@~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~@^@

Posted on Sunday, October 26th, 2008 at 6:01 am
comment | rss 2.0 | trackback