Heidegger

So now, while incessantly fundaments are claimed, the time has come to ask for
the meaning of Being as (stable) Anwesenheit, as it is predominant in the beginning
of “our” tradition. Those willing to continue to destroy it, are running away, and those
merely talking words, don’t talk no more. That is of course progress. The limits of
subjectivity have been reached, if the contradiction one has surrendered oneself too,
comes out too clear to be openly exposed to. What a filthy little game “philosophy”
has become, and since what a long time already. Nietzsche has seen the principle
of contradiction in its fundamental role for knowledge, and indicated what happens
to it, when the will to truth and knowledge crumbles

Once more: Being = stable Anwesenheit. Without this no western tradition.
One has the freedom tu run or not, one is not able though to hide one’s
running away from responsibility. The silence left is as ignoble as the lying.

And they all had such big mouths, as long as they felt “free” to throw their slander
on Heidegger. But they’ll rather go on to treat him as a nazi, and Christ as a maniacal
whipper, and so on, than not willing. Showing that everything is precisely upside down,
where, when and why. And so they cannot help helping those willing to try not-willing
by going back to stable presence with the Greeks, and start asking for its ‘fundament’.
The answers are already there, one just has to find the questions leading to them.
Instead of going on finding answers for problems no one has asked for.

rene

Posted on Monday, June 19th, 2006 at 10:30 am
comment | rss 2.0 | trackback