Is the Root of ‘Being’ Irrelevant?
December 16th, 2007, search relatedRelated posts :: Passage in “On the Essence of Truth” :: The Relationship between Axiom and Translation :: Cab Callowy - the Root of ‘Being’ Irrelevant? :: Questioning vs Assuming Being
In a message dated 12/15/2007 5:38:22 PM Eastern Standard Time,
GEVANS613 at aol.com writes:
Jud:
There you go again Joe - NOBODY would EVER *question* the fact that he/she
was
anything more than a human body. Even the stupid ones would realize that if
they moved their tongue and words came out that there was something going on
and that they had been through the language learning process and could speak
English and ask questions. The intelligent ones already know that A human being
WAS ‘NT anything more than a ideating embrained human body ANYWAY.
You are right, Jud, but only if you refrain from predicating “body” with
“human.” On the other hand, *I aint got no body* doesn’t mean you are not human.
Bernard
**************************************See AOL’s top rated recipes
http://food.aol.com/top-rated-recipes?NC…)
