Joseph Polanik the continuing Game Player
May 25th, 2008, search relatedRelated posts :: Joseph Polanik the continuing game player :: Joseph Polanik the continuing game player :: Joseph Polanik the continuing game player :: Joseph Polanik the continuing game player
Joseph Polanik wrote:
> Anthony Crifasi wrote:
>
>> Thank you for this response. You will receive a reply from me to it, as
>> well as to other points you have recently raised, once you have
>> completed your replies to every unique argument that I have already
>> given, are here:
>
> your word is no good, professor.
>
> I replied to a batch of your inquiries;
My inquiries were listed here:
http://an-archos.com/pipermail/heidegger…
Please point out where your replies to *most* (not all, but even just
*most*) of my unique inquiries there have been since then. I would
appreciate precise links please for every such reply that you claim to
have since given to every one of my unique arguments there. Upon
discovering your replies, I will acknowledge my mistake and begin
reciprocating.
and, all you did in return was
> click the reply button and say that you weren’t going to answer my
> questions concerning any conflict between your position and Heidegger’s
> position because, you claim, I misunderstand Heidegger so profoundly.
Yes, that was proven here:
http://an-archos.com/pipermail/heidegger…
> at this point, you need to clarify what precisely you are talking about.
> as recent posts have indicated,
>
> “I’m asking whether your argument negating, IPN, ‘it is Impossible to
> attribute Predicates to Nothing(ness)’, is equivalent to proving PPN,
> ‘it is Possible to attribute Predicates to Nothing(ness)’.”
>
> is that what you say you have achieved with an allegedly rational
> argument whose major premise is derivable from ‘I do not exist’ and
> whose minor premise guarantees that the major premise is either false or
> vacuous?
>
> until you at least tell us this, we might not have a clear idea of what
> your argument is about, if anything.
This explanation will be forthcoming as soon as you demonstrate basic
dialectical etiquette by addressing the objections from Descartes and
Hume that I cited here:
http://an-archos.com/pipermail/heidegger…
I await reciprocity on your part.
