Heidegger

>”Thus, there is a science distinct from these which is concerned WITH
>SEPARATE AND IMMOVABLE BEING, IF INDEED THERE EXISTS SUCH A SUBSTANCE,
>that is, one which is separate and immovable, as we shall try to show.
>And if indeed there is such a nature in things, the divine, too, would
>be here if anywhere, and this nature would be the primary and most
>dominant principle.” (a31-b2)

Anthony, would this last sentence indicate that Aristotle is a pantheist
(cf. “such a nature *in* things”); interesting, never thought of him that way.

yours,
Jan

Posted on Friday, February 1st, 2008 at 10:10 pm
comment | rss 2.0 | trackback