Heidegger

Pete earlier
>>> Reflect for a while on being as a verb, something that happens, and not
>>> as a noun or property of things.

Joe:
>> When ‘being’ becomes a verb, being becomes becoming.

Pete now:
> Well there’s your path then, the be-coming of being.

Pete & Joe, perhaps (and in a sense, not the only sense) be-ing [is]
be-coming, be-staying & be-going as one branched in time but in a synchronic
manner (of course, be-ing doesn’t come and go and stay for the duration but
is the becoming/begoing/bestaying of what comes and goes and stays a while).

Is this list be-comed? Or still be-gone?

regards to the void

michaelP

Posted on Thursday, February 14th, 2008 at 9:20 am
comment | rss 2.0 | trackback