More Heideggerian Hermeneutical HerpesII
October 27th, 2006, search relatedRelated posts :: A hermeneutical application of  Heidegger light :: A hermeneutical application of Heidegger light :: just a silent test…3 :: lunar owners - self and other
In a message dated 10/27/2006 12:30:16 PM Eastern Daylight Time,
GEVANS613 at aol.com writes:
JUD EVANS:
The eliminative determinist does not employ the very process of ‘abstraction’
in order to utter the serious charge of ‘abstraction!’
for neither *process* nor *abstraction exist. The ideating eliminative
determinist operates in an existential modality of criticising when he charges the
interlocutor with the silliness of attributing concrete existence to
*abstractions,* which are no more than the evanescent existential modalities of the
utterer
Dear Jud;
Of course a *concret abstraction* is as useless an oxymoron as a
*transcendent concretistic object.* The problem here is the use of the qualifier
*existence* or *existing* which has lost its meaning in either case. i.e. as *to have
real being whether material or spiritual.* But since *exist* is after the fact
of *instatuere,* to place in being or institute, an agency to this act is
required since neither occur autonomously (all by themselves). If they did we
would have to admit the (sic) existence of a prime mover as either *instatuerre,*
*to place in being* or such a mover as simply *autos.* At least linguistically
the idea of Self and God overlap. Thus the psychologist (e.g., Jung) may
reduce God to the psychological (object) as Self and the (Spiritual)
transcendentalist would transduce Self to God. In this way the object nature of what is
either reduced (to fundamental, i.e., radix) or transduced *as* the fundamental
reveals a bi-polarity in the matter of *to exist* or have being (*to have real
being whether material or spiritual.*). But we have an asshole ontology when
one pole is used to negate and subvert the other, e.g., when mania displaces
depression or vice versa. Therefore I do know what the fucking beef is all about
but a proto-Marxist dialectical parlour game of bouncing billiards and by
which the 8 ball of elimnative determinism serves only to sink whatever is
driven by the holy cue ball.
With all due reverence;
Bernard
(bxbovasso)
