Nine Per-Cent Nuttery
January 26th, 2008, search relatedRelated posts :: THE REIFICATIVE ROOTS OF THE GLOBAL FINANCIAL CRISIS. :: Immigration fuels 26 year fertility high :: Fertiliser [was a question for rene, Haber was one of ‘thehidden> enemies’. :: 1999
Yes, and I do not think I am advocating a totalitarian form of discourse
regarding the question of be-ing. But I do think you might take the time to
read Heidegger before/whilst entering into a discussion concerning that very
display par excellence of Heidegger’s distinction, his difference: the
ontological difference (between beings and be-ing). Without such an
ontological difference (for me) Heidegger is nothing (philosophically; yes,
an important thinker anyway, but without that stroke of insight of his that
others had only produced in their very unthought, he is insignificant except
in an obbvious notorious/celebrity manner).
Jud:
The total membership of The British Budgerigar Society is greater than the
number of religious and “philosophical” Don Quixotes who carry the cross of
the ancient *Ontological Difference* cult.
Latest Poll Figures.
Thank you for voting!
YES. Everything has a “being. 9% (97 votes)
NO. Objects simply exist. 91% (930 votes)
Total Votes: 1027
Return To Poll PollDaddy. com
