<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.0.2" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Plato, Heidegger, Iordanescu</title>
	<link>http://heidegger.an-archos.com/archive/plato-heidegger-iordanescu</link>
	<description>Philosophical Discussions</description>
	<pubDate>Tue, 02 Dec 2008 20:03:47 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.0.2</generator>

	<item>
		<title>by: HT</title>
		<link>http://heidegger.an-archos.com/archive/plato-heidegger-iordanescu#comment-6666</link>
		<pubDate>Sun, 01 Apr 2007 13:54:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://heidegger.an-archos.com/archive/plato-heidegger-iordanescu#comment-6666</guid>
					<description>IMHO the unmanifest as the possibile (Lat.) has never been but an ontic state in metaphysics. I don't understand how it can be anything else.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>IMHO the unmanifest as the possibile (Lat.) has never been but an ontic state in metaphysics. I don&#8217;t understand how it can be anything else.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
</channel>
</rss>
