Heidegger

On 08/06/2006, at 3:31 AM, That Pete wrote:

> I’m game. Multitudes watched the planes hits the towers and the towers
> collapse. There’s the footage that millions watched live on TV. The
> physics makes sense. What leads you to believe the towers were brought
> down by a controlled demolition?

The physics don’t even vaguely make sense, basically. For a start a
good summary of the main arguments for demolition are in the Jeff
King video on site at:

 http://heidegger.an-archos.com/archive/a…

and also the essays of BYU Physics Professor Steven E. Jones:

 http://www.physics.byu.edu/research/ener…

Note that neither of these gentlemen are “pomo type scholars, usual
suspects” and you will also require at least some knowledge of the
NIST and FEMA reports to rebut them:

 http://www.fema.gov/rebuild/mat/wtcstudy…
 http://wtc.nist.gov/pubs/NISTNCSTAR1Draf… (16MB)

Funny thing is the Congressionally funded NIST report did not cover
the collapse itself which somewhat limits its usefulness but it
remains the official scientific study. The FEMA report attempts to
fill in a few of the blanks so you really need to read the relevant
sections alongside NIST.

Shall we start with Jeff King then?

Cheers,

Malcolm

***************************
Dr Malcolm Riddoch
Electronic Arts
School of Communications and Contemporary Arts
Faculty of Communications and Creative Industries
Edith Cowan University, 2 Bradford St, Mount Lawley
Perth Western Australia
+61 08 9370 6034

Posted on Wednesday, June 7th, 2006 at 8:30 pm
comment | rss 2.0 | trackback
Tags: 911 demolition» video»