Heidegger Email List

June 7th, 2006, search related
Related posts :: Polemos - logically accounted controlled demolition :: Polemos - logically accounted controlled demolition :: Polemos - 911 Demolition :: Polemos - 911 Demolition

— Dr Malcolm Riddoch wrote:
> On 08/06/2006, at 5:03 AM, That Pete wrote:
>
> > — Malcolm Riddoch wrote:
> >> and also the essays of BYU Physics Professor Steven E. Jones:
> >>
> >> http://www.physics.byu.edu/research/ener…
> >
> > I read this. He’s a physicist who has done research in cold fusion
> > and also claims Jesus visited America. The structural engineers
> > at his own university dispute his analysis.
>
> Good start there, a nice #1. Denigrate and dismiss.

Eh? I think its very that Jesus visited America.

> Are you suggesting this paper is
> relevant to or calls into question his physics research?

I wouldn’t work in a skyscraper designed by a physicist.

> The dispute at BYU you mentioned has apparently been retracted by the
> Dean as none of the engineers in question came up with any detailed
> critique of the essay. You can read a summary of the academic scandal
> in the Wikipedia entry:

Heh.

> > What in his paper convinces you the twin towers were brought down
> > by a controlled explosions?
>
> We could start with the 47 story WTC7 near free fall symmetrical
> collapse into its own footprint complete with explosive squibs, or
> the pools of molten steel reported in all three basements that
> apparently remained molten for weeks after the collapse, along with
> the evidence of the sulfidation of steel suggesting a thermite
> reaction, or the pyroclastic flows that start at the top of the
> towers, or the early drop of the north tower antenna implying a
> catastrophic failure of the core brought the tower down. I think FEMA
> have brought out another report suggesting the antenna drop is merely
> an apparent drop due to the camera angle and perspective so you might
> want to pick on that one. Do you want to bring up the now discounted
> pancake theory at some point?

So it is all those taken together that convinces you that Bush blew
up three WTC buildings? So if one is proven false, your whole
conspiracy implodes? Or is there one item that by itself proves that
Bush did it definitively?

Leave a Reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.


banner ad