Heidegger

— Malcolm Riddoch wrote:
> No I disagree, for me the negation of what you view to be extremely
> polemical truths is the point, like for example your reaction to the
> notion that the 911 tower collapses can only be logically accounted
> for by controlled demolitions. It’s just a theory…

So’s a flat earth.
 http://www.scholarsfor911truth.org/WhoAr…
Looks like pomo type scholars, usual suspects, etc.

You could add them to proscribed list, but I think the flat
earth clause is sufficient.

What the engineers say:
9/11: Debunking The Myths http://www.popularmechanics.com/science/…

The heck of correctness.

Posted on Wednesday, June 7th, 2006 at 6:25 pm
comment | rss 2.0 | trackback