Heidegger

On 08/06/2006, at 2:23 AM, That Pete wrote:

> So’s a flat earth.
>
> http://www.scholarsfor911truth.org/WhoAr…
> Looks like pomo type scholars, usual suspects, etc.
>
> You could add them to proscribed list, but I think the flat
> earth clause is sufficient.
>
> What the engineers say:
> 9/11: Debunking The Myths
> http://www.popularmechanics.com/science/…
>
> The heck of correctness.

That’s more like it, I think we really need to discuss some of these
problems and you’re helping that discussion along That Pete so good
for you. And yes, Popular Mechanics is a populist publication and no
less averse to flat earth theories than anyone else, especially in
these troubled times. An excellent use all round of principle #1.
Denigrate and dismiss, subsection - Flat earth.

Cool, we’ve actually managed to start a serious 911 discussion on a
philosophy list. By the way, the main documents for negating the
proscribed interpretations are the FEMA, NIST and 911 Commission
reports rather than the mass media. Which one do you want to start with?

Cheers,

Malcolm

***************************
Dr Malcolm Riddoch
Electronic Arts
School of Communications and Contemporary Arts
Faculty of Communications and Creative Industries
Edith Cowan University, 2 Bradford St, Mount Lawley
Perth Western Australia
+61 08 9370 6034

Posted on Wednesday, June 7th, 2006 at 6:40 pm
comment | rss 2.0 | trackback